L. M. G. Kirk

597 total citations
8 papers, 466 citations indexed

About

L. M. G. Kirk is a scholar working on Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, L. M. G. Kirk has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 466 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 0 papers in Infectious Diseases and 0 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in L. M. G. Kirk's work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (8 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (8 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (5 papers). L. M. G. Kirk is often cited by papers focused on Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (8 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (8 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (5 papers). L. M. G. Kirk collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. L. M. G. Kirk's co-authors include P. J. Gregg, F. M. Khaw, Fu-Meng Khaw, Colin Esler, Philip N. Baker, Richard Morris, P. J. Gregg, Susanne Müller, James Holland and Andrew W. McCaskie and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, The Journal of Arthroplasty and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume.

In The Last Decade

L. M. G. Kirk

8 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
L. M. G. Kirk United Kingdom	7	462	14	10	10	9	8	466
Gabriele Panegrossi Italy	8	290 0.6×	11 0.8×	7 0.7×	10 1.0×	37 4.1×	20	301
K J Drabu United Kingdom	8	364 0.8×	9 0.6×	2 0.2×	15 1.5×	16 1.8×	15	373
Jonathan L. Knight United States	8	365 0.8×	30 2.1×	8 0.8×	4 0.4×	11 1.2×	12	376
Sridhar M. Durbhakula United States	8	364 0.8×	30 2.1×	6 0.6×	4 0.4×	9 1.0×	12	375
Filippo Casella Italy	8	352 0.8×	12 0.9×	6 0.6×	10 1.0×	37 4.1×	19	366
John-Paul Whittaker United Kingdom	7	289 0.6×	9 0.6×	2 0.2×	6 0.6×	16 1.8×	10	291
Vikram Desai United Kingdom	4	105 0.2×	11 0.8×	4 0.4×	2 0.2×	7 0.8×	8	110
Andreas Ottersbach Germany	7	405 0.9×	18 1.3×	1 0.1×	12 1.2×	7 0.8×	9	413
Rodney L. Plaster United States	5	419 0.9×	52 3.7×	3 0.3×	13 1.3×	15 1.7×	5	424
Daniel Hernández-Vaquero Spain	14	550 1.2×	29 2.1×	2 0.2×	25 2.5×	12 1.3×	41	560

Countries citing papers authored by L. M. G. Kirk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. M. G. Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. M. G. Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. M. G. Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. M. G. Kirk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. M. G. Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. M. G. Kirk. The network helps show where L. M. G. Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. M. G. Kirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. M. G. Kirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. M. G. Kirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. M. G. Kirk. L. M. G. Kirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Baker, Paul, et al.. (2012). A RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CEMENTED VERSUS CEMENTLESS PRESS-FIT CONDYLAR KNEE REPLACEMENT: FIFTEEN YEAR SURVIVAL ANALYSIS.. 109–109. 6 indexed citations

Khaw, Fu-Meng, et al.. (2007). Survivorship Analysis at 15 Years of Cemented Press-Fit Condylar Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 23(3). 344–349. 62 indexed citations

Baker, Philip N., F. M. Khaw, L. M. G. Kirk, Colin Esler, & P. J. Gregg. (2007). A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 89-B(12). 1608–1614. 138 indexed citations

Müller, Susanne, David J. Deehan, James Holland, et al.. (2006). Should we reconsider all-polyethylene tibial implants in total knee replacement?. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 88-B(12). 1596–1602. 42 indexed citations

Khaw, F. M., L. M. G. Kirk, Richard Morris, & P. J. Gregg. (2002). A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 84(5). 658–666. 73 indexed citations

Khaw, F. M., L. M. G. Kirk, Richard Morris, & P. J. Gregg. (2002). A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 84-B(5). 658–666. 30 indexed citations

Khaw, F. M., et al.. (2002). A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis.. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 84(5). 658–66. 58 indexed citations

Khaw, Fu-Meng, L. M. G. Kirk, & P. J. Gregg. (2001). Survival analysis of cemented Press-Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 16(2). 161–167. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact