L. Jen Shaffer

778 total citations
21 papers, 540 citations indexed

About

L. Jen Shaffer is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, L. Jen Shaffer has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 540 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in L. Jen Shaffer's work include Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). L. Jen Shaffer is often cited by papers focused on Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). L. Jen Shaffer collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Burkina Faso. L. Jen Shaffer's co-authors include Kusum Naithani, Jamon Van Den Hoek, Kapil K. Khadka, William W. Bowerman, William C. Walton, Mary Ann Ottinger, Reginal M. Harrell, Lindy J. Thompson, Hanneline Smit‐Robinson and Jennifer M. Mullinax and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cognition and Aquaculture.

In The Last Decade

L. Jen Shaffer

21 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
L. Jen Shaffer United States 11 280 127 95 70 62 21 540
Roxanne S. Beltran United States 16 377 1.3× 78 0.6× 23 0.2× 20 0.3× 28 0.5× 48 667
Dara M. Wald United States 13 115 0.4× 86 0.7× 65 0.7× 14 0.2× 120 1.9× 32 481
Emily M. McLeod Australia 13 352 1.3× 58 0.5× 60 0.6× 12 0.2× 62 1.0× 25 700
Louis Liebenberg United States 10 128 0.5× 33 0.3× 27 0.3× 13 0.2× 52 0.8× 10 409
Hannah S. Mumby United Kingdom 13 392 1.4× 98 0.8× 68 0.7× 12 0.2× 50 0.8× 31 806
John C. Mittermeier United Kingdom 11 133 0.5× 75 0.6× 38 0.4× 9 0.1× 91 1.5× 24 605
Michelle L. Lute United States 12 298 1.1× 120 0.9× 65 0.7× 10 0.1× 59 1.0× 17 478
Chelsea Batavia United States 12 185 0.7× 168 1.3× 114 1.2× 23 0.3× 113 1.8× 23 590
Ritwik Kulkarni South Africa 8 109 0.4× 69 0.5× 17 0.2× 9 0.1× 77 1.2× 12 324
Joseph L. Fox Norway 16 567 2.0× 56 0.4× 369 3.9× 19 0.3× 26 0.4× 23 760

Countries citing papers authored by L. Jen Shaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Jen Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Jen Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Jen Shaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Jen Shaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Jen Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Jen Shaffer. The network helps show where L. Jen Shaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Jen Shaffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Jen Shaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Jen Shaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Jen Shaffer. L. Jen Shaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shaffer, L. Jen, et al.. (2025). Facilitators and barriers to implementing smoke-free homes in Armenia: a qualitative study. Global Health Promotion. 32(4). 117–126. 1 indexed citations
2.
Drew, Joshua, et al.. (2024). Labor archetypes in industrial transitions: Case studies from yankee whaling and gulf wind energy in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science. 113. 103535–103535. 1 indexed citations
3.
Krüger, Sonja, André Botha, William W. Bowerman, et al.. (2022). Old World Vultures Reflect Effects of Environmental Pollutants Through Human Encroachment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 41(7). 1586–1603. 8 indexed citations
4.
Poor, Erin E., et al.. (2021). Increasing diversity to save biodiversity: Rising to the challenge and supporting Indonesian women in conservation. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(6). 12 indexed citations
5.
Thompson, Lindy J., Sonja Krüger, L. Jen Shaffer, et al.. (2021). Assessing African Vultures as Biomonitors and Umbrella Species. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 11 indexed citations
6.
Shaffer, L. Jen, et al.. (2021). The practice of everyday oystering: aquaculture as resistance. Journal of Political Ecology. 28(1). 3 indexed citations
7.
Thompson, Lindy J., William W. Bowerman, Hanneline Smit‐Robinson, et al.. (2021). Reviewing the Role of Vultures at the Human-Wildlife-Livestock Disease Interface: An African Perspective. Journal of Raptor Research. 55(3). 21 indexed citations
8.
Walton, William C., et al.. (2021). Cultural ecosystem services enabled through work with shellfish. Marine Policy. 132. 104689–104689. 15 indexed citations
9.
Shaffer, L. Jen, et al.. (2021). Expert Perceptions of Conflicts in African Vulture Conservation: Implications for Overcoming Ethical Decision-Making Dilemmas. Journal of Raptor Research. 55(3). 3 indexed citations
10.
Ottinger, Mary Ann, André Botha, Ralph Buij, et al.. (2021). A Strategy for Conserving Old World Vulture Populations in the Framework of One Health. Journal of Raptor Research. 55(3). 7 indexed citations
11.
Gore, Meredith L., Annette Hübschle, André Botha, et al.. (2020). A conservation criminology-based desk assessment of vulture poisoning in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Global Ecology and Conservation. 23. e01076–e01076. 21 indexed citations
12.
Walton, William C., et al.. (2020). The role of ecosystem services in the decision to grow oysters: A Maryland case study. Aquaculture. 529. 735633–735633. 13 indexed citations
13.
Shaffer, L. Jen, Kapil K. Khadka, Jamon Van Den Hoek, & Kusum Naithani. (2019). Human-Elephant Conflict: A Review of Current Management Strategies and Future Directions. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 6. 231 indexed citations
14.
Shaffer, L. Jen. (2017). An Anthropological Perspective on the Climate Change and Violence Relationship. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). 3(4). 222–232. 10 indexed citations
15.
Shaffer, L. Jen. (2017). Rain Rituals as a Barometer of Vulnerability in an Uncertain Climate. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 19(1). 4 indexed citations
16.
Shaffer, L. Jen. (2014). Making Sense of Local Climate Change in Rural Tanzania Through Knowledge Co-Production. Journal of Ethnobiology. 34(3). 315–334. 13 indexed citations
17.
Shaffer, L. Jen, et al.. (2011). Why Analyze Mental Models of Local Climate Change? A Case from Southern Mozambique. Weather Climate and Society. 3(4). 223–237. 17 indexed citations
18.
Shaffer, L. Jen. (2010). Indigenous Fire Use to Manage Savanna Landscapes in Southern Mozambique. Fire Ecology. 6(2). 43–59. 61 indexed citations
19.
Shaffer, L. Jen. (2008). A Landscape of Possibilities: Seeking Food Security in Matutúine District, Mozambique. Insecta mundi. 2 indexed citations
20.
Shaffer, L. Jen. (1985). Metre and rhythm in piano playing. Cognition. 20(1). 61–77. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026