L. J. Allen‐Williams

577 total citations
16 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

L. J. Allen‐Williams is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, L. J. Allen‐Williams has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Insect Science, 11 papers in Plant Science and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in L. J. Allen‐Williams's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (8 papers). L. J. Allen‐Williams is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers) and Insect Pest Control Strategies (8 papers). L. J. Allen‐Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. L. J. Allen‐Williams's co-authors include KA Evans, Nora Underwood, Stuart Warrington, I. H. Williams, Douglas Warner, A. W. Ferguson, R. Bardner, Nadège Hamon, Hugh D. Loxdale and W. Powell and has published in prestigious journals such as Pest Management Science, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Annals of Applied Biology.

In The Last Decade

L. J. Allen‐Williams

16 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
L. J. Allen‐Williams United Kingdom 13 372 250 172 93 91 16 474
P. Esbjerg Denmark 13 287 0.8× 180 0.7× 143 0.8× 67 0.7× 83 0.9× 33 436
James H. Lashomb United States 15 570 1.5× 392 1.6× 317 1.8× 130 1.4× 138 1.5× 44 728
Chang–Chi Chu United States 16 492 1.3× 455 1.8× 169 1.0× 81 0.9× 28 0.3× 32 632
Jo‐Ann Bentz United States 13 292 0.8× 329 1.3× 150 0.9× 32 0.3× 65 0.7× 29 447
K. L. Robb United States 14 603 1.6× 470 1.9× 211 1.2× 125 1.3× 68 0.7× 27 720
M.M. Davidson New Zealand 16 428 1.2× 315 1.3× 189 1.1× 138 1.5× 63 0.7× 51 584
Mary Carver Australia 14 512 1.4× 282 1.1× 290 1.7× 59 0.6× 76 0.8× 62 626
Angela K. Grant United States 12 321 0.9× 307 1.2× 122 0.7× 109 1.2× 59 0.6× 17 524
D. J. Chamberlain United Kingdom 9 246 0.7× 175 0.7× 99 0.6× 95 1.0× 54 0.6× 17 362
M. J. Gaylor United States 16 554 1.5× 282 1.1× 287 1.7× 170 1.8× 62 0.7× 40 661

Countries citing papers authored by L. J. Allen‐Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. J. Allen‐Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. J. Allen‐Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. J. Allen‐Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. J. Allen‐Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. J. Allen‐Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. J. Allen‐Williams. The network helps show where L. J. Allen‐Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. J. Allen‐Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. J. Allen‐Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. J. Allen‐Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. J. Allen‐Williams. L. J. Allen‐Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Loxdale, Hugh D., et al.. (2011). Flying with a ‘death sentence’ on board: electrophoretic detection of braconid parasitoid larvae in migrating winged grain aphids,Sitobion avenae(F.). Bulletin of Entomological Research. 101(4). 443–449. 9 indexed citations
2.
Warner, Douglas, L. J. Allen‐Williams, Stuart Warrington, A. W. Ferguson, & I. H. Williams. (2008). Implications for conservation biocontrol of spatio‐temporal relationships between carabid beetles and coleopterous pests in winter oilseed rape. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 10(4). 375–387. 23 indexed citations
3.
Warner, Douglas, L. J. Allen‐Williams, Stuart Warrington, A. W. Ferguson, & I. H. Williams. (2003). Mapping, characterisation, and comparison of the spatio‐temporal distributions of cabbage stem flea beetle (Psylliodes chrysocephala), carabids, and Collembola in a crop of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 109(3). 225–234. 28 indexed citations
4.
Warner, Douglas, L. J. Allen‐Williams, A. W. Ferguson, & I. H. Williams. (2000). Pest-predator spatial relationships in winter rape: implications for integrated crop management. Pest Management Science. 56(11). 977–982. 30 indexed citations
5.
Allen‐Williams, L. J., et al.. (2000). Prey selection and foraging behaviour byPterostichus cupreusL. (Col., Carabidae) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Applied Entomology. 124(9-10). 349–358. 31 indexed citations
6.
Allen‐Williams, L. J., et al.. (1999). Prey preferences of six species of Carabidae (Coleoptera) and one Lycosidae (Araneae) commonly found in UK arable crop fields. Journal of Applied Entomology. 123(4). 193–200. 33 indexed citations
7.
Evans, KA & L. J. Allen‐Williams. (1998). Response of Cabbage Seed Weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis) to Baits of Extracted and Synthetic Host-Plant Odor. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 24(12). 2101–2114. 11 indexed citations
8.
Allen‐Williams, L. J., et al.. (1996). Behavioral responses of three species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to olfactory cues associated with prey and habitat. Journal of Insect Behavior. 9(2). 237–250. 102 indexed citations
9.
Burgess, Alexandra J., Stuart Warrington, & L. J. Allen‐Williams. (1996). CABBAGE APHID (BREVICORYNE BRASSICAE. L.) âPERFORMANCEâ ON OILSEED RAPE (BRASSICA NAPUS. L.) EXPERIENCING WATER DEFICITS: ROLES OF TEMPERATURE AND FOOD QUALITY.. Acta Horticulturae. 499–506. 11 indexed citations
10.
Evans, KA & L. J. Allen‐Williams. (1994). Laboratory and field response of the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus, to the odour of oilseed rape. Physiological Entomology. 19(4). 285–290. 28 indexed citations
11.
Evans, KA & L. J. Allen‐Williams. (1993). Distant olfactory response of the cabbage seed weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis, to oilseed rape odour in the field. Physiological Entomology. 18(3). 251–256. 28 indexed citations
12.
Evans, KA & L. J. Allen‐Williams. (1992). Electroantennogram responses of the cabbage seed weevil,Ceutorhynchus assimilis, to oilseed rape,Brassica napus ssp.Oleifera, volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 18(9). 1641–1659. 54 indexed citations
13.
Powell, W., et al.. (1990). Electrophoresis as a tool for estimating levels of hymenopterous parasitism in field populations of the cereal aphid, Sitobion avenue. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 54(3). 271–279. 28 indexed citations
14.
Hamon, Nadège, et al.. (1990). Carabid populations in field beans and their effect on the population dynamics of Sitona lineatus (L.). Annals of Applied Biology. 117(1). 51–62. 17 indexed citations
15.
Hamon, Nadège, et al.. (1987). Flight periodicity and infestation size of Sitona lineatus. Annals of Applied Biology. 111(2). 271–284. 28 indexed citations
16.
Hamon, Nadège, et al.. (1984). Larval instar determination of the pea and bean weevil Sitona lineatus L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026