L. Guimarãis
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Topics
- Magnetic confinement fusion research (34 papers)Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (23 papers)Fusion materials and technologies (12 papers)
In The Last Decade
L. Guimarãis
33 papers receiving 494 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 483
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 249
- Materials Chemistry 183
- Aerospace Engineering 158
- Biomedical Engineering 136
Countries citing papers authored by L. Guimarãis
This map shows the geographic impact of L. Guimarãis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Guimarãis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Guimarãis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L. Guimarãis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Guimarãis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Guimarãis. The network helps show where L. Guimarãis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of L. Guimarãis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of L. Guimarãis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of L. Guimarãis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with L. Guimarãis. L. Guimarãis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stationary edge localized mode-free H-mode in ASDEX Upgrade | 37 |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | The ITER Baseline Scenario Investigated at ASDEX-Upgrade | 3 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | Strongly Non-linear Energetic Particle Dynamics in ASDEX Upgrade Scenarios with Core Impurity Accumulation | 12 |
| 7 | 76 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | LFS/HFS edge density profile dynamics on ASDEX-Upgrade | 2 |
| 15 | Microwaves used for the first time in the position control of a fusion machine | 1 |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About L. Guimarãis
L. Guimarãis is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (34 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (23 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (483 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (249 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (158 citations). L. Guimarãis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Portugal and France. Frequent co-authors include J. Santos, M. Bernert, M. Dunne, W. Treutterer, M. E. Manso, M. Zilker, E. Wolfrum, T. Lunt, M. Wischmeier and F. Reimold. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science and Nuclear Fusion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.