Kyo Jin Jo
About
In The Last Decade
Kyo Jin Jo
13 papers receiving 114 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Health 65
- Infectious Diseases 55
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 25
- Epidemiology 22
- Molecular Biology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Kyo Jin Jo
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyo Jin Jo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyo Jin Jo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyo Jin Jo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyo Jin Jo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyo Jin Jo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyo Jin Jo. The network helps show where Kyo Jin Jo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyo Jin Jo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyo Jin Jo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyo Jin Jo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kyo Jin Jo. Kyo Jin Jo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 67 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.