Kyle T. Amber

87 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Kyle T. Amber
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.1k
  • Genetics 603
  • Rheumatology 677
  • Dermatology 310
  • Hematology 110
Replace Jeffrey Kaine with:
Jeffrey Kaine United States
S. Prey France
Matija Tomšič Slovenia
François Chasset France
Serena Bugatti Italy
Ali Askari United States
Marian Danilewicz Poland
Małgorzata Wągrowska‐Danilewicz Poland
Frederick B. Vivino United States
Neta Goldschmidt Israel
Kyle T. Amber relative to Jeffrey Kaine United States Jeffrey Kaine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Jeffrey Kaine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle T. Amber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle T. Amber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle T. Amber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle T. Amber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle T. Amber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle T. Amber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle T. Amber. The network helps show where Kyle T. Amber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle T. Amber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle T. Amber Line = papers co-authored together Kyle T. Amber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017119
2 201894
3 201979
4 201875
5 201866
6 201562
7 201854
8 201954
9 201554
10 201551
11 201850
12 201345
13 202044
14 201444
15 201541
16 202040
17 201739
18 201439
19 202038
20 201938

About Kyle T. Amber

Kyle T. Amber is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology, Genetics, Dermatology and Epidemiology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (54 papers), Urticaria and Related Conditions (32 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (25 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (7 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (5 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (4 papers) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k citations), Genetics (603 citations), Rheumatology (677 citations), Dermatology (310 citations) and Hematology (110 citations). Kyle T. Amber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Khalaf Kridin, Michael Hertl, Manuel Valdebran, Sergei A. Grando, Romi Bloom, Payal M. Patel, Luca Borradori, Virginia Jones, Arnon D. Cohen and Enno Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Dermatological Research, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Frontiers in Immunology, Experimental Dermatology and JAMA Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact