Kyle R. Ratinac
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Polymers and Plastics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Filip BraetSimon P. RingerWenrong YangPall ThordarsonJ. Justin GoodingHuanting WangDong‐Hwang ChenLi‐Xing Yang
- Topics
- Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (6 papers)Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (4 papers)Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Kyle R. Ratinac
33 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.1k
- Biomedical Engineering 856
- Molecular Biology 628
- Polymers and Plastics 421
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle R. Ratinac
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle R. Ratinac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle R. Ratinac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle R. Ratinac more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle R. Ratinac
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle R. Ratinac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle R. Ratinac. The network helps show where Kyle R. Ratinac may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kyle R. Ratinac
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kyle R. Ratinac. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kyle R. Ratinac based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kyle R. Ratinac. Kyle R. Ratinac is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 72 | |
| 4 | 140 | |
| 5 | 233 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | Carbon Nanomaterials in Biosensors: Should You Use Nanotubes or Graphene?breakdown → | 1179 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 243 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Case studies in nanostructural analysis for understanding nanomaterials | 2 |
About Kyle R. Ratinac
Kyle R. Ratinac is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Biophysics and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (6 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (4 papers) and Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrochemistry (410 citations), Bioengineering (237 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (421 citations). Kyle R. Ratinac has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Taiwan and China. Frequent co-authors include Filip Braet, Simon P. Ringer, Wenrong Yang, Pall Thordarson, J. Justin Gooding, Huanting Wang, Dong‐Hwang Chen, Li‐Xing Yang, Huaiyong Zhu and Jianfeng Yao. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Environmental Science & Technology and Biomaterials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.