Kyle Nash
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 15
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 11
- Neural dynamics and brain function 7
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 7
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 8
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 7
- Health top 2%
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 9
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 6
- Co-authors
- Ian McGregorMichael InzlichtMike PrenticeAaron C. KayDanielle GaucherJacob B. HirshLorena R. R. GianottiDaria Knoch
- Journals
- Brain Topography (5 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (4 papers)Biological Psychology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Kyle Nash
46 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 660
- Applied Psychology 173
- Social Psychology 636
- Health 253
- General Decision Sciences 37
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Nash. The network helps show where Kyle Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 68 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 66 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 155 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 57 |
About Kyle Nash
Kyle Nash is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (660 citations), Applied Psychology (173 citations) and Social Psychology (636 citations). Kyle Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ian McGregor, Michael Inzlicht, Mike Prentice, Aaron C. Kay, Danielle Gaucher, Jacob B. Hirsh, Lorena R. R. Gianotti, Daria Knoch, Curtis E. Phills and Tobias Kleinert. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Topography, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Biological Psychology, Scientific Reports and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.