Kyle Cochrane
Impact in
- Geophysics top 5%
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
-
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Papers in
- Geophysics 29
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 29
-
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 20
- Co-authors
- Thomas R. MattssonM. P. DesjarlaisMarcus D. KnudsonAidan P. ThompsonGary S. GrestJ. Matthew D. LaneFlint PierceDavid E. Bliss
- Journals
- Physics of Plasmas (10 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (7 papers)Physical review. B. (7 papers)Physical Review B (3 papers)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Kyle Cochrane
44 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Geophysics 516
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 383
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 398
- Mechanics of Materials 302
- Materials Chemistry 365
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Cochrane
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Cochrane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Cochrane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Cochrane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Cochrane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Cochrane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Cochrane. The network helps show where Kyle Cochrane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Cochrane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 15 | Ethane and Xenon mixing: density functional theory (DFT) simulations and experiments on Sandia's Z machine | 2012 | 1 |
| 16 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 265 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 119 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 112 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 0 |
About Kyle Cochrane
Kyle Cochrane is a scholar working on Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (29 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (20 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (8 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (8 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (516 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (383 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (398 citations), Mechanics of Materials (302 citations) and Materials Chemistry (365 citations). Kyle Cochrane has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Mattsson, M. P. Desjarlais, Marcus D. Knudson, Aidan P. Thompson, Gary S. Grest, J. Matthew D. Lane, Flint Pierce, David E. Bliss, R. W. Lemke and M. E. Savage. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical review. B., Physical Review B and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.