Kwan-Hwa Chi
- Otorhinolaryngology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Jean BourhisDaniel T. T. ChuaJean‐Pierre PignonAnthony T.�C. ChanDora L.�W. KwongHaluk OnatMuhyi Al‐SarrafKullathorn Thephamongkhol
- Topics
- Head and Neck Cancer Studies (7 papers)Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers)Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (3 papers)
- Cited by
- OtorhinolaryngologyOncologySurgery
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Kwan-Hwa Chi
24 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Otorhinolaryngology 668
- Surgery 604
- Oncology 484
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 373
- Molecular Biology 248
Countries citing papers authored by Kwan-Hwa Chi
This map shows the geographic impact of Kwan-Hwa Chi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kwan-Hwa Chi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kwan-Hwa Chi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kwan-Hwa Chi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kwan-Hwa Chi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kwan-Hwa Chi. The network helps show where Kwan-Hwa Chi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kwan-Hwa Chi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kwan-Hwa Chi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kwan-Hwa Chi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kwan-Hwa Chi. Kwan-Hwa Chi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake patterns in Waldeyer's ring for differentiating benign from malignant lesions in lateral pharyngeal recess of nasopharynx. | 37 |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 495 | |
| 18 | 85 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 63 |
About Kwan-Hwa Chi
Kwan-Hwa Chi is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Physiology and Oncology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (7 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers) and Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (668 citations), Oncology (484 citations) and Surgery (604 citations). Kwan-Hwa Chi has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jean Bourhis, Daniel T. T. Chua, Jean‐Pierre Pignon, Anthony T.�C. Chan, Dora L.�W. Kwong, Haluk Onat, Muhyi Al‐Sarraf, Kullathorn Thephamongkhol, Hélène Audry and Masato Hareyama. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.