Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fabrication and Optical Properties of High‐Performance Polycrystalline Nd:YAG Ceramics for Solid‐State Lasers
19951.0k citationsAkio Ikesue, Kunio Yoshida et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Kunio Yoshida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kunio Yoshida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kunio Yoshida more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kunio Yoshida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kunio Yoshida. The network helps show where Kunio Yoshida may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kunio Yoshida
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kunio Yoshida.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kunio Yoshida based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kunio Yoshida. Kunio Yoshida is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nakamuta, Y., Shigeki Yamada, & Kunio Yoshida. (2006). Estimation of Shock Pressure Experienced by Each Ordinary Chondrite with an X-Ray Diffraction Method. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 41(8). 5034.
Miyamoto, Shingo, et al.. (2004). Widely Tunable CW Nd-doped Y2O3 Ceramic Laser. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.2 indexed citations
6.
Yoshida, Kunio, Akio Ikesue, & Yasumasa Okamoto. (2004). All ceramic composite with layer by layer and clad-core structure by advanced ceramic technology. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 1.5 indexed citations
7.
Ikesue, Akio, Takahisa Yamamoto, & Kunio Yoshida. (2004). In suture-less bonded single crystal and ceramic composite lasers. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 2.3 indexed citations
8.
Yabe, Takashi, Claude Phipps, Masashi Yamaguchi, et al.. (2001). PropoSal and Demonstration of Laser-DriVen Micro-Airplane. Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology). 77(12). 1177–1179.6 indexed citations
Yoshida, Kunio, Hiroyuki Yoshida, Kazuo Tanaka, & S. Nakai. (1992). Phase-conjugate mirrors using organic solvent vapor. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics.1 indexed citations
13.
Yokotani, Atsushi, et al.. (1988). EFFECT OF THE ORGANIC IMPURITIES IN POTASSIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE SOLUTION ON THE LASER DAMAGE THRESHOLD OF THE CRYSTALS FOR HIGH POWER LASERS.1 indexed citations
14.
Nagai, H., et al.. (1988). Some cosmogenic nuclides in chondrites and iron meteorites.. 13. 86–88.1 indexed citations
15.
Honda, M., et al.. (1983). Cosmogenic 10 Be in Meteoritic Irons and Stones. Meteoritics and Planetary Science. 18. 315–76.3 indexed citations
Yamanaka, Chiyoe, et al.. (1972). PLASMA GENERATION AND HEATING TO THERMONUCLEAR TEMPERATURE BY LASERS.. National Institute for Fusion Science Repository (National Institute for Fusion Science). 117. 1–34.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.