Kun Feng

73 total papers · 1.6k total citations
49 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Kun Feng is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kun Feng has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Molecular Biology and 11 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Kun Feng's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (9 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers). Kun Feng is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (9 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers). Kun Feng collaborates with scholars based in China, Macao and Canada. Kun Feng's co-authors include Shaoping Li, J. Zhao, Feng Yang, Pozi Liu, Xiaoqian Zhang, Qingjing Ye, Jiahong Yu, Zhuping Yao, Hongjian Wan and Meiying Ruan and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Kun Feng

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Kun Feng	447	353	333	201	167	49	1.2k
Xiaoxi He	219 0.5×	243 0.7×	93 0.3×	283 1.4×	118 0.7×	56	1.2k
Xiaoming Du	147 0.3×	278 0.8×	163 0.5×	591 2.9×	286 1.7×	75	1.5k
María Garrido	194 0.4×	269 0.8×	67 0.2×	82 0.4×	208 1.2×	59	1.3k
Ralf Uebelhack	104 0.2×	145 0.4×	143 0.4×	92 0.5×	50 0.3×	69	1.2k
Yadhu N. Singh	275 0.6×	288 0.8×	111 0.3×	97 0.5×	78 0.5×	46	1.3k
Eun Ha Lee	242 0.5×	433 1.2×	131 0.4×	90 0.4×	23 0.1×	51	1.4k
Daniel F. Martins	146 0.3×	263 0.7×	255 0.8×	66 0.3×	114 0.7×	47	1.3k
Jinsong Wu	857 1.9×	519 1.5×	74 0.2×	101 0.5×	58 0.3×	53	1.5k
A. Brattström	249 0.6×	208 0.6×	73 0.2×	50 0.2×	25 0.1×	55	987
Fancheng Meng	229 0.5×	441 1.2×	262 0.8×	85 0.4×	16 0.1×	65	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Kun Feng

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kun Feng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kun Feng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kun Feng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kun Feng

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kun Feng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kun Feng. The network helps show where Kun Feng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kun Feng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kun Feng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kun Feng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kun Feng. Kun Feng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact