Kuen‐Feng Chen
About
In The Last Decade
Kuen‐Feng Chen
99 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Molecular Biology 3.1k
- Oncology 1.6k
- Cancer Research 975
- Epidemiology 712
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 679
Countries citing papers authored by Kuen‐Feng Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Kuen‐Feng Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kuen‐Feng Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kuen‐Feng Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kuen‐Feng Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kuen‐Feng Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kuen‐Feng Chen. The network helps show where Kuen‐Feng Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kuen‐Feng Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kuen‐Feng Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kuen‐Feng Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kuen‐Feng Chen. Kuen‐Feng Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 136 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.