K.T. Slattery

669 citations
16 papers · 443 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

K.T. Slattery

16 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

K.T. Slattery
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Materials Chemistry 370
  • Mechanical Engineering 226
  • Mechanics of Materials 120
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 61
  • Ceramics and Composites 18
Replace B. Li with:
B. Li China
A. Makhankov Russia
A. A. Deribas Russia
J. Schmitz Germany
Valiantsin M. Astashynski Belarus
A. Gervash Russia
R. Kruessmann Germany
S.S. Khirwadkar India
Kazutoshi Tokunaga Japan
Fuli Tan China
K.T. Slattery relative to B. Li China B. Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
B. Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.T. Slattery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.T. Slattery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.T. Slattery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.T. Slattery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.T. Slattery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.T. Slattery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.T. Slattery. The network helps show where K.T. Slattery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside K.T. Slattery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.T. Slattery Line = papers co-authored together K.T. Slattery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1998294
2 199632
3 199830
4 199713
5 200811
6 199810
7 20049
8 19989
9 20027
10 20025
11 20035
12 19985
13 20034
14 20023
15 20023
16 20023

About K.T. Slattery

K.T. Slattery is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fusion materials and technologies (14 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (7 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (6 papers), Advanced materials and composites (5 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (5 papers), Metallurgical and Alloy Processes (2 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (1 paper) and Medical research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (370 citations), Mechanical Engineering (226 citations), Mechanics of Materials (120 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (61 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (18 citations). K.T. Slattery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include V. Barabash, Jim Davis, A. Makhankov, L Plöchl, R.D. Watson, D.E. Driemeyer, B.C. Odegard, M. Ulrickson, J.W. Davis and Lester M. Waganer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Fusion Engineering and Design, Fusion Science & Technology, The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact