Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulean at Konso, Ethiopia
This map shows the geographic impact of Kozo Uto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kozo Uto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kozo Uto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kozo Uto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kozo Uto. The network helps show where Kozo Uto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kozo Uto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kozo Uto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kozo Uto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kozo Uto. Kozo Uto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kajiwara, T., et al.. (2004). Unzen Volcano Scientific Drilling: Well Logging Data of the USDP-4. AGUFM. 2004.5 indexed citations
6.
Uto, Kozo, et al.. (2004). Overview and the achievement of the Unzen Scientific Drilling Project. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2004.2 indexed citations
7.
Nakada, Setsuya, et al.. (2004). Real Images of Magmatic Conduit: Progress of the Conduit Drilling in Unzen. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2004.3 indexed citations
8.
Goto, Yoshihiko, Setsuya Nakada, Taketo Shimano, et al.. (2004). Conduit drilling at Unzen volcano, Japan: core description and interpretation. AGUFM. 2004.2 indexed citations
9.
Saito, Genji, Kozo Uto, Kohei Kazahaya, & Hisaaki Shinohara. (2003). Magma ascent and degassing process of Miyakejima 2000 eruption: constraints from glass inclusions and volcanic gases. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Supplement. 67(18). 408.1 indexed citations
Uto, Kozo & Setsuya Nakada. (2003). 4. Unzen Scientific Drilling Project(VII. International Activities)(Reports on Volcanic Activities and Volcanological Studies in Japan for the Period from 1999 to 2002). 48(4). 90–92.1 indexed citations
12.
Uto, Kozo, et al.. (2001). Volcanotectonic history of Shimabara Peninsula and the evolution of Unzen volcano in Southwest Japan. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.1 indexed citations
13.
Nohda, Susumu, Ichiro Kaneoka, Takeshi Hanyu, & Kozo Uto. (2001). Systematic Variation of Sr, Nd and Pb Isotopes with Time Observed in lavas of Mauritius Island. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.1 indexed citations
Uto, Kozo, et al.. (1991). K-Ar age determinations for Aso volcanic rocks : concordance with volcanostratigraphy and application to pyroclastic flows. 1991(2). 73.58 indexed citations
Uto, Kozo. (1989). Neogene volcanism of Southwest Japan : Its time and space based on K-Ar dating.. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 184.34 indexed citations
20.
Takada, Akira, et al.. (1988). The 1986 Eruption and Products of Izu-Oshima Volcano, Japan. 33.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.