Koos de Wit

634 total citations
15 papers, 259 citations indexed

About

Koos de Wit is a scholar working on Hepatology, Epidemiology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Koos de Wit has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 259 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Hepatology, 8 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Koos de Wit's work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). Koos de Wit is often cited by papers focused on Liver Disease and Transplantation (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). Koos de Wit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Koos de Wit's co-authors include Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen, Paul Fockens, Manon van der Vlugt, Evelien Dekker, Joep IJspeert, Ulrich Beuers, François Durand, Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee, Elisa Pose and Vı́ctor Vargas and has published in prestigious journals such as Hepatology, Journal of Hepatology and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

Koos de Wit

13 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Koos de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Epidemiology 128
  • Hepatology 117
  • Oncology 82
  • Surgery 80
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 65
Thinesh Lee Krishnamoorthy Singapore
Marta Cervera Spain
Carlos Romero‐Marrero United States
Mónica Marino Italy
Wacław Hołówko Poland
Natalie C. Fisher United Kingdom
Suzanne van Meer Netherlands
Omar Elshaarawy Egypt
Longzhi Han China
Ioannis Theodoropoulos Greece
Thinesh Lee Krishnamoorthy Singapore View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Koos de Wit
Koos de Wit · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Koos de Wit
Koos de Wit · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Koos de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koos de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koos de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koos de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koos de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koos de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koos de Wit. The network helps show where Koos de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Koos de Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Koos de Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Koos de Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Koos de Wit. Koos de Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 26
4 2
5 6
6 0
7 84
8 31
9
Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience.
2
10
[A day in the life of a medical resident on the ward].
2
11 26
12
Een dag uit het leven van de zaalarts interne geneeskunde
2
13 1
14 74
15 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026