Kok-Why Ng

481 citations
51 papers · 251 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kok-Why Ng

35 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Kok-Why Ng
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Information Systems 55
  • Human-Computer Interaction 13
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Signal Processing 24
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 7
Replace G. M. Siddesh with:
G. M. Siddesh India
Paola Ariza-Colpas Colombia
Meennapa Rukhiran Thailand
Radha Senthilkumar India
Shabana Ramzan Pakistan
R. Suguna India
Muhammad Tahir Pakistan
Saurabh Pratap Singh Rathore India
Manas Ranjan Pradhan United Arab Emirates
Mahmoud Othman Egypt
Kok-Why Ng relative to G. M. Siddesh India G. M. Siddesh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
G. M. Siddesh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kok-Why Ng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kok-Why Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kok-Why Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kok-Why Ng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kok-Why Ng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kok-Why Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kok-Why Ng. The network helps show where Kok-Why Ng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Kok-Why Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kok-Why Ng Line = papers co-authored together Kok-Why Ng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202442
2 202217
3 202017
4 202417
5 202317
6 201915
7 201214
8 202411
9 201310
10 20238
11 20238
12 20227
13 20146
14 20226
15 20235
16 20225
17 20245
18 20234
19 20224
20 20244

About Kok-Why Ng

Kok-Why Ng is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications and Signal Processing, having authored 51 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recommender Systems and Techniques (6 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (4 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (3 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (3 papers) and Human Pose and Action Recognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (55 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (13 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Signal Processing (24 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (7 citations). Kok-Why Ng has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, Indonesia and India. Frequent co-authors include Su-Cheng Haw, Palanichamy Naveen, Morteza SaberiKamarposhti, Mehdi Yadollahi, Fang-Fang Chua, Majid Khorami, Hesam Kamyab, C. Eswaran, Junaidi Abdullah and Mona Moradi. Their work appears in journals such as MethodsX, Pattern Recognition Letters, Environmental Research, IEEE Access and Heliyon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact