Koichi Mita
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 7
- Co-authors
- Masakane Yamashita (12 shared papers)Noriyuki Yoshida (4 shared papers)Yoshinao Katsu (3 shared papers)Yoshitaka Nagahama (3 shared papers)Shingo Nakahata (3 shared papers)Kunio Inoue (1 shared paper)Tomoya Kotani (2 shared papers)Etsuro Ito (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Koichi Mita
27 papers receiving 700 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Aging 51
- Physiology 103
- Reproductive Medicine 85
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 134
- Aquatic Science 44
Countries citing papers authored by Koichi Mita
This map shows the geographic impact of Koichi Mita's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koichi Mita with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koichi Mita more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Koichi Mita
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koichi Mita. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koichi Mita. The network helps show where Koichi Mita may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Koichi Mita, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 6 |
About Koichi Mita
Koichi Mita is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Physiology, Aging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 712 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (51 citations), Physiology (103 citations), Reproductive Medicine (85 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (134 citations) and Aquatic Science (44 citations). Koichi Mita has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Masakane Yamashita, Noriyuki Yoshida, Yoshinao Katsu, Yoshitaka Nagahama, Shingo Nakahata, Kunio Inoue, Tomoya Kotani, Etsuro Ito, Chiaki Katagiri and Yutaka Fujito. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Developmental Biology, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Development Growth & Differentiation, Neurochemical Research and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.