Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Koentjaraningrat
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Koentjaraningrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koentjaraningrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koentjaraningrat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Koentjaraningrat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koentjaraningrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koentjaraningrat. The network helps show where Koentjaraningrat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Koentjaraningrat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Koentjaraningrat.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Koentjaraningrat based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Koentjaraningrat. Koentjaraningrat is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Koentjaraningrat. (1994). Irian Jaya: membangun masyarakat majemuk.19 indexed citations
3.
Koentjaraningrat, et al.. (1993). Masalah kesukubangsaan dan integrasi nasional.28 indexed citations
4.
Koentjaraningrat. (1993). Masyarakat terasing di Indonesia.15 indexed citations
5.
Koentjaraningrat. (1987). Kebudayaan, mentalitas dan pembangunan (Bunga Rampai).1 indexed citations
6.
Koentjaraningrat. (1985). Ritus peralihan di Indonesia.19 indexed citations
7.
Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Masalah-masalah pembangunan : bunga rampai antropologi terapan.11 indexed citations
8.
Koentjaraningrat & Donald K. Emmerson. (1982). ASPEK MANUSIA DALAM PENELITIAN MASYARAKAT. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).9 indexed citations
Koentjaraningrat. (1975). Anthropology in Indonesia : a bibliographical review.18 indexed citations
11.
Koentjaraningrat. (1974). Kebudayaan, mentalitet dan pembangunan.62 indexed citations
12.
Koentjaraningrat. (1974). Bunga Rampai Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).10 indexed citations
13.
Koentjaraningrat. (1973). Village life south of Jakarta : brief report of a comparative study on "Village life around capital cities of southeast Asia".
14.
Koentjaraningrat. (1971). Manusia dan kebudajaan di Indonesia.7 indexed citations
15.
Koentjaraningrat, et al.. (1969). Kerangka untuk meneliti faktor2 sosial-budaja dalam pembangunan ekonomi.
16.
Koentjaraningrat. (1969). Arti antropologi untuk Indonesia masa ini.1 indexed citations
17.
Koentjaraningrat. (1969). Rintangan2 mental dalam pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia.
18.
Koentjaraningrat. (1969). Masjarakat dan kopra rakjat di pantai Utara Irian Barat.
19.
Koentjaraningrat. (1967). Beberapa pokok antropologi sosial. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).108 indexed citations
20.
Koentjaraningrat. (1957). A preliminary description of the Javanese kinship system. University Microfilms International eBooks.25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.