Koen Kramer

512 total citations
19 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

Koen Kramer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Koen Kramer has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Koen Kramer's work include Blood donation and transfusion practices (5 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Koen Kramer is often cited by papers focused on Blood donation and transfusion practices (5 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Koen Kramer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, China and France. Koen Kramer's co-authors include Heikki Hänninen, Rui Zhang, Jiasheng Wu, Jens Peter Skovsgaard, Jean‐Daniel Bontemps, Carlos Gracia, Harald Bugmann, Marcus Lindner, Marcel van Oijen and Thomas Rötzer and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Plant Science, Ecological Applications and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Koen Kramer

19 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Koen Kramer Netherlands 8 208 155 68 65 51 19 337
Shiroma Sathyapala Italy 6 174 0.8× 66 0.4× 44 0.6× 153 2.4× 21 0.4× 6 331
Sebastian González‐Caro Colombia 12 100 0.5× 227 1.5× 48 0.7× 71 1.1× 41 0.8× 23 365
Orazio Ciancio Italy 10 227 1.1× 192 1.2× 76 1.1× 66 1.0× 31 0.6× 69 395
Peter Brocklehurst Australia 8 165 0.8× 101 0.7× 17 0.3× 153 2.4× 27 0.5× 14 301
Marc Grünig Switzerland 8 124 0.6× 60 0.4× 31 0.5× 85 1.3× 13 0.3× 12 246
Roy A. Mask United States 5 320 1.5× 221 1.4× 45 0.7× 150 2.3× 117 2.3× 6 397
Alfonso San Miguel-Ayanz Spain 9 89 0.4× 120 0.8× 52 0.8× 139 2.1× 15 0.3× 11 294
Marcos Silveira Brazil 10 141 0.7× 176 1.1× 75 1.1× 75 1.2× 11 0.2× 29 346
Baibing Ma China 4 80 0.4× 118 0.8× 41 0.6× 124 1.9× 21 0.4× 9 336
Wayne E. MacKinnon Canada 11 365 1.8× 224 1.4× 30 0.4× 286 4.4× 25 0.5× 21 502

Countries citing papers authored by Koen Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koen Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koen Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen Kramer. The network helps show where Koen Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Koen Kramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Koen Kramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Koen Kramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Koen Kramer. Koen Kramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Rui, Jianhong Lin, Isabelle Chuine, et al.. (2023). Discovering ecophysiological causes of different spring phenology responses of trees to climatic warming. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 340. 109593–109593. 5 indexed citations
2.
Thomas, Stephen, Koen Kramer, Françoise Rossi, et al.. (2023). Safety profile of plasma for fractionation donated in the United Kingdom, with respect to variantCreutzfeldt–Jakobdisease. Vox Sanguinis. 118(5). 345–353. 3 indexed citations
3.
Kramer, Koen. (2023). When Is Something an Alternative? A General Account Applied to Animal-Free Alternatives to Animal Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 33(1). 89–101. 4 indexed citations
4.
Kramer, Koen & F.L.B. Meijboom. (2022). The Ethics of Innovations in Genomic Selection: On How to Broaden the Scope of Discussion. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 35(2). 2 indexed citations
5.
Kramer, Koen & F.L.B. Meijboom. (2022). How Do Technologies Affect How We See and Treat Animals? Extending Technological Mediation Theory to Human-animal Relations. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 25(4). 595–611. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bovenkerk, Bernice & Koen Kramer. (2022). 30. The ethics of remedial animal enhancement: what can we learn from other (dis)enhancement debates?. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 205–210. 1 indexed citations
7.
Meijboom, F.L.B., et al.. (2022). 63. Technological mediation of empathetic human-animal relations through gene editing technologies. 406–411. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kramer, Koen & F.L.B. Meijboom. (2021). Using Breeding Technologies to Improve Farm Animal Welfare: What is the Ethical Relevance of Telos?. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 34(1). 7 indexed citations
9.
Zhang, Rui, Jianhong Lin, Fucheng Wang, et al.. (2021). Spring phenology in subtropical trees: Developing process-based models on an experimental basis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 314. 108802–108802. 16 indexed citations
10.
Shiklomanov, Alexey, Michael Bahn, Chaeho Byun, et al.. (2019). Does the leaf economic spectrum hold within plant functional types? A Bayesian multivariate trait meta‐analysis. Ecological Applications. 30(3). e02064–e02064. 22 indexed citations
11.
Kramer, Koen, Marcel Verweij, & Hans L. Zaaijer. (2019). When are infection risks of blood transfusion tolerable? Towards understanding the ethical views of stakeholders in the blood supply. Vox Sanguinis. 114(7). 658–665. 3 indexed citations
12.
Hänninen, Heikki, Koen Kramer, Karen Tanino, et al.. (2018). Experiments Are Necessary in Process-Based Tree Phenology Modelling. Trends in Plant Science. 24(3). 199–209. 91 indexed citations
13.
Kramer, Koen, Marcel Verweij, & Hans L. Zaaijer. (2017). Are there ethical differences between stopping and not starting blood safety measures?. Vox Sanguinis. 112(5). 417–424. 8 indexed citations
14.
Kramer, Koen, Hans L. Zaaijer, & Marcel Verweij. (2017). The Precautionary Principle and the Tolerability of Blood Transfusion Risks. The American Journal of Bioethics. 17(3). 32–43. 15 indexed citations
15.
Verweij, Marcel & Koen Kramer. (2016). Donor blood screening and moral responsibility: how safe should blood be?. Journal of Medical Ethics. 44(3). 187–191. 4 indexed citations
16.
Kramer, Koen, Marcel Verweij, & Hans L. Zaaijer. (2015). An inventory of concerns behind blood safety policies in five Western countries. Transfusion. 55(12). 2816–2825. 8 indexed citations
17.
Fontes, Luís, Jean‐Daniel Bontemps, Harald Bugmann, et al.. (2010). Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment. Forest Systems. 19. 8–29. 142 indexed citations
18.
Madsen, Palle, Catherine Collet, Koen Kramer, Khosro Sagheb‐Talebi, & Kazuhiko Terazawa. (2010). Preface. Forest Ecology and Management. 259(11). vii–vii. 1 indexed citations
19.
Kramer, Koen, et al.. (1961). Zur Bekämpfung der Buchenwollschildlaus(Cryptococcus fagi Bär.) mit chemischen Mitteln. Journal of Pest Science. 34(3). 42–43. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026