KM Ismail

453 total citations
9 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

KM Ismail is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, KM Ismail has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Rheumatology, 4 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in KM Ismail's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (2 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers). KM Ismail is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (4 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (2 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers). KM Ismail collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and Netherlands. KM Ismail's co-authors include R. Katie Morris, Jason Gardosi, Katariina Laine, Vladimír Kališ, A. Francis, DG Tincello, Derrick Yates, Edward Morris, Nicholas Turner and Jason Cooper and has published in prestigious journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, BMJ Open and International Urogynecology Journal.

In The Last Decade

KM Ismail

8 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
KM Ismail United Kingdom	6	215	152	151	83	76	9	320
Valerie Donnelly Ireland	7	339 1.6×	368 2.4×	80 0.5×	60 0.7×	43 0.6×	8	452
Fatih Şanlıkan Türkiye	11	46 0.2×	117 0.8×	196 1.3×	57 0.7×	63 0.8×	33	319
Michael D. Moen United States	12	155 0.7×	199 1.3×	131 0.9×	50 0.6×	47 0.6×	25	340
Verena Geissbühler Switzerland	10	147 0.7×	117 0.8×	120 0.8×	74 0.9×	84 1.1×	19	345
Fred S. Miyazaki United States	9	133 0.6×	148 1.0×	162 1.1×	55 0.7×	165 2.2×	11	378
N Price United Kingdom	9	314 1.5×	323 2.1×	121 0.8×	149 1.8×	92 1.2×	13	524
R Bahl United Kingdom	7	246 1.1×	195 1.3×	277 1.8×	117 1.4×	160 2.1×	16	453
Aşkı Ellibeş Kaya Türkiye	11	75 0.3×	122 0.8×	94 0.6×	115 1.4×	77 1.0×	28	279
Andrea Stuart Sweden	10	64 0.3×	128 0.8×	146 1.0×	39 0.5×	109 1.4×	34	290
TA Mahmood United Kingdom	6	331 1.5×	264 1.7×	277 1.8×	127 1.5×	105 1.4×	7	512

Countries citing papers authored by KM Ismail

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of KM Ismail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by KM Ismail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites KM Ismail more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by KM Ismail

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by KM Ismail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by KM Ismail. The network helps show where KM Ismail may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of KM Ismail

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of KM Ismail. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of KM Ismail based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with KM Ismail. KM Ismail is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Wattar, Bassel H. Al, et al.. (2017). Training on Kielland’s forceps: A survey of trainees’ opinions. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 37(3). 280–283. 5 indexed citations

2.

Morton, Victoria Hodgetts, R. Katie Morris, A. Francis, Jason Gardosi, & KM Ismail. (2016). Effectiveness of Folic Acid Supplementation in Pregnancy on Reducing the Risk of Small-for-Gestational Age Neonates. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 36(1). 22–23. 2 indexed citations

3.

Ismail, KM, et al.. (2015). General or Spinal Anaesthetic for Vaginal Surgery in Pelvic Floor Disorders (GOSSIP): a feasibility randomised controlled trial. International Urogynecology Journal. 26(8). 1171–1178. 14 indexed citations

4.

Yates, Derrick, et al.. (2015). Manual perineal support at the time of childbirth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 122(9). 1157–1165. 72 indexed citations

5.

Cooper, Jason, et al.. (2014). Developing Objective Metrics for Unit Staffing (DOMUS) study. BMJ Open. 4(9). e005398–e005398. 5 indexed citations

6.

Morris, Edward, et al.. (2014). Developing core patient‐reported outcomes in maternity: PRO‐Maternity. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 121(s4). 15–19. 17 indexed citations

7.

Morris, R. Katie, et al.. (2014). Effectiveness of folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on reducing the risk of small‐for‐gestational age neonates: a population study, systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 122(4). 478–490. 101 indexed citations

8.

Kališ, Vladimír, et al.. (2012). Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 119(5). 522–526. 104 indexed citations

9.

Kališ, Vladimír, et al.. (2012). Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 119(10). 1284–1285.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact