Klaus Wolff
About
In The Last Decade
Klaus Wolff
8 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Immunology 184
- Oncology 144
- Dermatology 109
- Rheumatology 99
- Immunology and Allergy 90
Countries citing papers authored by Klaus Wolff
This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus Wolff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus Wolff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus Wolff. The network helps show where Klaus Wolff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Klaus Wolff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Klaus Wolff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Klaus Wolff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Klaus Wolff. Klaus Wolff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 120 | |
| 3 | 101 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | The treatment of the depressed and suicidal geriatric patient. | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.