Kimberly To
About
In The Last Decade
Kimberly To
9 papers receiving 379 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Epidemiology 227
- Infectious Diseases 218
- Molecular Biology 82
- Surgery 53
- Small Animals 46
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly To
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly To's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly To with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly To more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly To
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly To. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly To. The network helps show where Kimberly To may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kimberly To
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kimberly To. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kimberly To based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kimberly To. Kimberly To is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 147 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 105 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 43 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.