Kim Sutherby
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- George SzmuklerGraham ThornicroftClaire HendersonMorven LeeseChris FloodSarah ByfordDiana RoseBarbara Barrett
- Topics
- Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kim Sutherby
16 papers receiving 704 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Clinical Psychology 616
- General Health Professions 246
- Philosophy 234
- Psychiatry and Mental health 181
- Social Psychology 99
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Sutherby
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Sutherby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Sutherby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Sutherby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Sutherby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Sutherby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Sutherby. The network helps show where Kim Sutherby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Sutherby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Sutherby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Sutherby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Sutherby. Kim Sutherby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 125 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 56 | |
| 7 | Joint crisis plans for people with psychosis: Economic evaluation of an RCT | 3 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 205 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 85 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | Mental health. Sending in the paras. | 0 |
| 17 | The domiciliary consultation service: outdated anachronism or essential part of community psychiatric outreach? | 4 |
About Kim Sutherby
Kim Sutherby is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (616 citations), Philosophy (234 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (181 citations). Kim Sutherby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include George Szmukler, Graham Thornicroft, Claire Henderson, Morven Leese, Chris Flood, Sarah Byford, Diana Rose, Barbara Barrett, Christine Johnson and Graham Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.