Kim Shifren
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Karen HookerDeborah J. MonahanLeslie D. FrazierSally R. BowmanDenise C. ParkRobert BausermanMelissa D. ZwahrSy‐Miin Chow
- Topics
- Family Support in Illness (10 papers)Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kim Shifren
33 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Clinical Psychology 399
- Sociology and Political Science 396
- Social Psychology 226
- General Health Professions 206
- Applied Psychology 201
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Shifren
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Shifren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Shifren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Shifren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Shifren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Shifren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Shifren. The network helps show where Kim Shifren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Shifren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Shifren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Shifren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Shifren. Kim Shifren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do Instrumental and Expressive Traits Play a Role in Health-Promoting Behaviors? A Study among Former Young Caregivers | 1 |
| 2 | Early Caregiver Experiences, Optimism, and Mental Health: Former Young Caregivers and Emerging Adult Caregivers | 2 |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 102 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 185 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | Personality Counts for a Lot: Predictors of Mental and Physical Health of Spouse Caregivers in Two Disease Groups | 2 |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Kim Shifren
Kim Shifren is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Family Practice, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (81 citations), Applied Psychology (201 citations) and Health (164 citations). Kim Shifren has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karen Hooker, Deborah J. Monahan, Leslie D. Frazier, Sally R. Bowman, Denise C. Park, Robert Bauserman, Melissa D. Zwahr, Sy‐Miin Chow, John R. Nesselroade and Roger W. Morrell. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Personality and Individual Differences and Psychology and Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.