Kim Gracie
About
In The Last Decade
Kim Gracie
8 papers receiving 390 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 273
- Organic Chemistry 249
- Biomedical Engineering 175
- Filtration and Separation 115
- Catalysis 95
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Gracie
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Gracie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Gracie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Gracie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Gracie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Gracie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Gracie. The network helps show where Kim Gracie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Gracie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Gracie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Gracie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Gracie. Kim Gracie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 174 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 90 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.