Kim Glickman

416 total citations
10 papers, 289 citations indexed

About

Kim Glickman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Glickman has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 289 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kim Glickman's work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (6 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). Kim Glickman is often cited by papers focused on Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (6 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). Kim Glickman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Russia. Kim Glickman's co-authors include M. Katherine Shear, Angela Ghesquiere, Melanie M. Wall, Natalia Skritskaya, Barry D. Lebowitz, Michael B. First, Sidney Zisook, Christine Mauro, Naomi M. Simon and Naihua Duan and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Kim Glickman

10 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim Glickman United States 8 255 106 64 52 28 10 289
Carina Heeke Germany 12 393 1.5× 77 0.7× 118 1.8× 62 1.2× 21 0.8× 20 418
Charissa Pratt United States 5 220 0.9× 61 0.6× 78 1.2× 54 1.0× 22 0.8× 5 309
Yonit Schorr United States 6 336 1.3× 54 0.5× 84 1.3× 39 0.8× 34 1.2× 6 367
Rene Weideman Canada 9 302 1.2× 85 0.8× 63 1.0× 76 1.5× 10 0.4× 13 328
Mariken Spuij Netherlands 11 323 1.3× 88 0.8× 81 1.3× 29 0.6× 15 0.5× 25 365
Sarah E. D. Perzow United States 8 157 0.6× 133 1.3× 25 0.4× 54 1.0× 34 1.2× 10 302
Nada Martinek Australia 6 278 1.1× 145 1.4× 60 0.9× 32 0.6× 22 0.8× 6 316
Chantal P Delaquis France 4 201 0.8× 165 1.6× 33 0.5× 70 1.3× 18 0.6× 7 307
Jamison S. Bottomley United States 10 306 1.2× 66 0.6× 82 1.3× 55 1.1× 62 2.2× 33 341
Katherine Ottman United States 8 119 0.5× 43 0.4× 58 0.9× 67 1.3× 18 0.6× 12 201

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Glickman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Glickman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Glickman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Glickman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Glickman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Glickman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Glickman. The network helps show where Kim Glickman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Glickman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Glickman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Glickman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Glickman. Kim Glickman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Glickman, Kim. (2021). Prolonged Grief Disorder in a Diverse College Student Sample. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 604573–604573. 16 indexed citations
2.
Glickman, Kim, et al.. (2021). Psychological distress, attitudes toward seeking help, and utilization of college counseling at a predominantly minority college. Journal of American College Health. 71(3). 765–774. 7 indexed citations
3.
Glickman, Kim, M. Katherine Shear, & Melanie M. Wall. (2018). Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome in Complicated Grief Treatment. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 11(2). 222–233. 6 indexed citations
4.
Mauro, Christine, M. Katherine Shear, Charles F. Reynolds, et al.. (2016). Performance characteristics and clinical utility of diagnostic criteria proposals in bereaved treatment-seeking patients. Psychological Medicine. 47(4). 608–615. 31 indexed citations
5.
Glickman, Kim, M. Katherine Shear, & Melanie M. Wall. (2016). Mediators of Outcome in Complicated Grief Treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 73(7). 817–828. 24 indexed citations
6.
Glickman, Kim, M. Katherine Shear, & Melanie M. Wall. (2014). Exploring Outcomes Related to Anxiety and Depression in Completers of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Complicated Grief Treatment. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 23(2). 118–124. 14 indexed citations
7.
Shear, M. Katherine, Angela Ghesquiere, & Kim Glickman. (2013). Bereavement and Complicated Grief. Current Psychiatry Reports. 15(11). 406–406. 160 indexed citations
8.
O'Connor, Mary‐Frances, et al.. (2012). Catecholamine predictors of complicated grief treatment outcomes. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 88(3). 349–352. 12 indexed citations
9.
Glickman, Kim, et al.. (2011). Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: A guide for the psychological therapies. Psychotherapy Research. 21(6). 732–734. 6 indexed citations
10.
Glickman, Kim. (2011). The heart & soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (2nd ed.).. Psychotherapy Research. 21(6). 734–736. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026