Kim Brady

521 citations
12 papers · 347 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kim Brady

12 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Kim Brady
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 161
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 84
  • Rheumatology 59
  • Hematology 38
  • Nephrology 21
Replace J.Peter VanDorsten with:
J.Peter VanDorsten United States
Manuel Álvarez United States
James F. McCaul United States
Boonchai Uerpairojkit Thailand
R. William Stettler United States
Marc H. Incerpi United States
Suleiman Al-Mohaya Saudi Arabia
Fawaz Alkazaleh Canada
Charles M. Stedman United States
Ramesh Ganapathy United Kingdom
Kim Brady relative to J.Peter VanDorsten United States J.Peter VanDorsten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J.Peter VanDorsten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Brady

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Brady

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Brady. The network helps show where Kim Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Kim Brady, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Brady Line = papers co-authored together Kim Brady links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 20019
2 200041
3 199834
4 199516
5 19921
6 199118
7 199165
8 199111
9
The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.
199161
10 199036
11 198926
12 198929

About Kim Brady

Kim Brady is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (161 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (84 citations), Rheumatology (59 citations), Hematology (38 citations) and Nephrology (21 citations). Kim Brady has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John A. Read, William Polzin, Frederick E. Harlass, Patrick Duff, Jerome Kopelman, Randal D. Robinson, Peggy Walsh, Michael S. Baggish, Steven Reid and William J. Watson. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Perinatology, Medical Decision Making and The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026