K.I. Deen

2.3k total citations
67 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

K.I. Deen is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, K.I. Deen has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Surgery, 31 papers in Oncology and 20 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in K.I. Deen's work include Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (24 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (24 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (20 papers). K.I. Deen is often cited by papers focused on Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (24 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (24 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (20 papers). K.I. Deen collaborates with scholars based in Sri Lanka, United Kingdom and United States. K.I. Deen's co-authors include M R B Keighley, J G Williams, Dinesh Kumar, J F Olliff, Pramodh Chandrasinghe, Lucinda Billingham, E Grant, Sumudu Kumarage, Denise Youngs and Jane Warwick and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Surgery and Gut.

In The Last Decade

K.I. Deen

65 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K.I. Deen Sri Lanka 21 1.1k 599 561 151 117 67 1.5k
Thomas Schiedeck Germany 25 1.6k 1.4× 999 1.7× 396 0.7× 293 1.9× 51 0.4× 93 2.1k
Nils G. Kock Sweden 20 1.0k 1.0× 333 0.6× 172 0.3× 151 1.0× 245 2.1× 36 1.5k
Neil Johns United Kingdom 24 702 0.6× 506 0.8× 113 0.2× 150 1.0× 72 0.6× 36 2.1k
Evaghelos Xynos Greece 28 1.6k 1.5× 657 1.1× 331 0.6× 316 2.1× 48 0.4× 76 2.1k
William J. Anderson United States 20 413 0.4× 271 0.5× 164 0.3× 933 6.2× 63 0.5× 70 1.4k
Cornelius E. J. Sloots Netherlands 23 1.4k 1.3× 149 0.2× 311 0.6× 221 1.5× 102 0.9× 86 1.7k
William E. Wise United States 13 560 0.5× 489 0.8× 150 0.3× 203 1.3× 52 0.4× 23 967
Benjamin Tan United Kingdom 18 537 0.5× 466 0.8× 179 0.3× 307 2.0× 104 0.9× 36 2.1k
William V. Harford United States 20 955 0.9× 675 1.1× 261 0.5× 707 4.7× 65 0.6× 43 1.6k
Daniele Diacinti Italy 27 645 0.6× 565 0.9× 57 0.1× 175 1.2× 143 1.2× 74 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by K.I. Deen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.I. Deen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.I. Deen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.I. Deen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.I. Deen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.I. Deen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.I. Deen. The network helps show where K.I. Deen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K.I. Deen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K.I. Deen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K.I. Deen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K.I. Deen. K.I. Deen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chandrasinghe, Pramodh, et al.. (2020). Complete migration of a composite mesh into small bowel incidentally found during laparotomy for colectomy in an asymptomatic patient: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 14(1). 207–207. 1 indexed citations
2.
Chandrasinghe, Pramodh, et al.. (2017). Overall Survival of Elderly Patients Having Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Comparable to Younger Patients: Results from a South Asian Population. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2017. 1–6. 7 indexed citations
3.
Sirisena, Nirmala D., et al.. (2017). The pattern of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective audit from Sri Lanka. BMC Research Notes. 10(1). 392–392. 12 indexed citations
4.
Ediriweera, Dileepa Senajith, Sumudu Kumarage, & K.I. Deen. (2016). Comparison of hazard of death following surgery for colon versus rectal cancer. Ceylon Medical Journal. 61(2). 52–52. 2 indexed citations
6.
Chandrasinghe, Pramodh, et al.. (2013). Obstructive jaundice caused by a biliary mucinous cystadenoma in a woman: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 7(1). 278–278. 6 indexed citations
7.
Pathmeswaran, A., et al.. (2009). Colonoscopic ultrasound is associated with a learning phenomenon despite previous rigid probe experience. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 28(3). 96–98. 1 indexed citations
8.
Deen, K.I., et al.. (2009). A new technique for suture rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Techniques in Coloproctology. 13(1). 27–33. 8 indexed citations
9.
Perera, M. Thamara P. R., et al.. (2008). The prevalence of colorectal cancer and survival in patients from the Gampaha District, North Colombo region. Ceylon Medical Journal. 53(1). 17–17. 11 indexed citations
10.
Deen, K.I., et al.. (2008). Assessment of ‘nucleation time’ as a predictor of cholelithiasis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 20(10). 1020–1023. 1 indexed citations
11.
Perera, M. Thamara P. R., et al.. (2008). Sexual and urinary dysfunction following rectal dissection compared with segmental colectomy. Colorectal Disease. 10(7). 689–693. 9 indexed citations
12.
Deen, K.I., et al.. (2005). Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Down-Stages the Tumor but Reduces Lymph Node Harvest Significantly. Surgery Today. 35(6). 442–445. 51 indexed citations
13.
Deen, K.I., et al.. (2002). The internal jugular vein valve may have a significant role in the prevention of venous reflux: evidence from live and cadaveric human subjects. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 22(3). 202–205. 30 indexed citations
14.
Deen, K.I., et al.. (2001). Comparison of hydrogen peroxide instillation with Goodsall’s fule for fistula‐in‐ano. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 71(8). 472–474. 35 indexed citations
15.
Deen, K.I., et al.. (1998). The recto‐anal inhibitory reflex: Abnormal response in diabetics suggests an intrinsic neuroenteropathy†. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 13(11). 1107–1110. 16 indexed citations
16.
Körsgen, Stephan, K.I. Deen, & M R B Keighley. (1997). Long-term results of total pelvic floor repair for postobstetric fecal incontinence. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 40(7). 835–839. 23 indexed citations
17.
Deen, K.I. & Robert D. Madoff. (1996). Rectal prolapse: impact on pelvic floor physiology and current management. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 7(3). 160–169.
18.
Bernini, Andrea, K.I. Deen, Robert D. Madoff, & W. Douglas Wong. (1996). Preoperative adjuvant radiation with chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Its impact on stage of disease and the role of endorectal ultrasound. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 3(2). 131–135. 47 indexed citations
19.
Deen, K.I., Dinesh Kumar, J G Williams, J F Olliff, & M R B Keighley. (1993). The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study.. Gut. 34(5). 685–688. 105 indexed citations
20.
Deen, K.I., Dinesh Kumar, J G Williams, J F Olliff, & M R B Keighley. (1993). Anal Sphincter Defects Correlation Between Endoanal Ultrasound and Surgery. Annals of Surgery. 218(2). 201–205. 130 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026