Khulaif Alshammari
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Khulaif Alshammari
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Khulaif Alshammari. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Khulaif Alshammari based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Khulaif Alshammari. Khulaif Alshammari is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Khulaif Alshammari
33 papers receiving 453 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Khulaif Alshammari
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khulaif Alshammari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khulaif Alshammari. The network helps show where Khulaif Alshammari may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Khulaif Alshammari
This map shows the geographic impact of Khulaif Alshammari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khulaif Alshammari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khulaif Alshammari more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.