Khin Lwin

19 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

Khin Lwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Management Science and Operations Research 213
  • Finance 96
  • Signal Processing 100
  • Information Systems 193
  • Artificial Intelligence 233
Replace Carlos Castro with:
Carlos Castro Chile
Jimmy Ming‐Tai Wu China
Ildar Batyrshin Mexico
Mu‐En Wu Taiwan
Rui Neves Portugal
V. N. Sastry India
Ahmed S. Alfakeeh Saudi Arabia
Jonghun Park South Korea
Jun-Lin Lin Taiwan
Nikolay Laptev United States
Khin Lwin relative to Carlos Castro Chile Carlos Castro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Carlos Castro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Khin Lwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Khin Lwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khin Lwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khin Lwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Khin Lwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khin Lwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khin Lwin. The network helps show where Khin Lwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Khin Lwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Khin Lwin Line = papers co-authored together Khin Lwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2014139
2 2017106
3 201887
4 202081
5 201857
6 201756
7 201353
8 201844
9 201933
10 201927
11 201925
12 201619
13 201912
14 20167
15 20136
16 20185
17 20173
18 20162
19 20191

About Khin Lwin

Khin Lwin is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spam and Phishing Detection (4 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (4 papers), Risk and Portfolio Optimization (4 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (2 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (2 papers) and Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (213 citations), Finance (96 citations), Signal Processing (100 citations), Information Systems (193 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (233 citations). Khin Lwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bangladesh and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rong Qu, Mohammad Alamgir Hossain, Graham Kendall, Marzia Hoque Tania, Bart L. MacCarthy, Antesar Shabut, Md Aslam Hossain, M. Shamim Kaiser, A. E. Sarhan and Mufti Mahmud. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Applied Intelligence, European Journal of Operational Research and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact