Keyong Dong

434 citations
12 papers · 282 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Keyong Dong

12 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Keyong Dong
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Finance 69
  • Public Administration 23
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 42
  • Communication 22
  • General Health Professions 60
Replace Alasdair Rutherford with:
Alasdair Rutherford United Kingdom
Ather H. Akbari Canada
Sílvia Gerschman Brazil
Francesco Longo Italy
Rodrigo Alfaro Switzerland
Kate Williams Australia
Roy Kwon United States
Timon Forster Switzerland
Hans Vollaard Netherlands
Soraya Vargas Côrtes Brazil
Keyong Dong relative to Alasdair Rutherford United Kingdom Alasdair Rutherford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Alasdair Rutherford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keyong Dong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keyong Dong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keyong Dong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keyong Dong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keyong Dong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keyong Dong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keyong Dong. The network helps show where Keyong Dong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Keyong Dong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keyong Dong Line = papers co-authored together Keyong Dong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2009110
2 201044
3 201225
4 201225
5 199620
6 200316
7 201215
8 201410
9 201610
10 20185
11 20141
12 20101

About Keyong Dong

Keyong Dong is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper) and Global and Cross-Cultural Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (69 citations), Public Administration (23 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (42 citations), Communication (22 citations) and General Health Professions (60 citations). Keyong Dong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xin Liu, Belton M. Fleisher, Yunhua Liu, Leiyu Shi, Qi Cao, Hufeng Wang, Kuotsai Tom Liou, Lan Xue, Peng Cui and Andrew Podger. Their work appears in journals such as China Economic Review, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Public Administration and Development, Economic and Political Studies and International Journal of Health Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact