Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Inside the black box of regional development--human capital, the creative class and tolerance
2008612 citationsRichard Florida, Charlotta Mellander et al.Journal of Economic Geographyprofile →
Night-Time Light Data: A Good Proxy Measure for Economic Activity?
2015337 citationsCharlotta Mellander, José Lobo et al.PLoS ONEprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Stolarick
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Stolarick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Stolarick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Stolarick more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Stolarick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Stolarick. The network helps show where Kevin Stolarick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Stolarick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Stolarick.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Stolarick based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Stolarick. Kevin Stolarick is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Florida, Richard, Charlotta Mellander, & Kevin Stolarick. (2016). Human capital in cities and suburbs. The Annals of Regional Science. 57(1). 91–123.11 indexed citations
3.
Mellander, Charlotta, et al.. (2015). Night-Time Light Data: A Good Proxy Measure for Economic Activity?. PLoS ONE. 10(10). e0139779–e0139779.337 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Florida, Richard, Charlotta Mellander, & Kevin Stolarick. (2015). Creativity and Prosperity: The Global Creativity Index. TSpace (University of Toronto).55 indexed citations
Stolarick, Kevin. (2013). The (Current) Extent of India's Urbanization.
7.
Stolarick, Kevin. (2012). Functional Creative Economies:The Spatial Distribution of Creative Workers. Journal of rural and community development. 7(3).2 indexed citations
Stolarick, Kevin, et al.. (2011). Creativity, Tourism and Economic Development in a Rural Context: the Case of Prince Edward County. 5(1).40 indexed citations
13.
Florida, Richard, Charlotta Mellander, Kevin Stolarick, & Andrew Ross. (2011). Cities, skills and wages. Journal of Economic Geography. 12(2). 355–377.72 indexed citations
14.
Gabe, Todd, et al.. (2011). Knowledge in Cities. Urban Studies. 49(6). 1179–1200.22 indexed citations
Florida, Richard, Charlotta Mellander, & Kevin Stolarick. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development--human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography. 8(5). 615–649.612 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Florida, Richard, et al.. (2008). Density and Creativity in U.S. Regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 98(2). 461–478.105 indexed citations
Florida, Richard, et al.. (2005). BEYOND SPILLOVERS: THE EFFECTS OF CREATIVE-DENSITY ON INNOVATION.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.