Kevin Schuler

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 974 citations indexed

About

Kevin Schuler is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Kevin Schuler has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 974 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Kevin Schuler's work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers). Kevin Schuler is often cited by papers focused on Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers). Kevin Schuler collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and South Korea. Kevin Schuler's co-authors include John F. Boggess, Anastasia Ivanova, Rabbie K. Hanna, Leigh A. Cantrell, Emma Rossi, Jennifer Scalici, Lynn D. Kowalski, Paola A. Gehrig, Alberto A. Mendivil and Victoria Bae‐Jump and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Lancet Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Kevin Schuler

15 papers receiving 958 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study

2017 599 citations Emma Rossi, Lynn D. Kowalski et al. The Lancet Oncology profile →

Peers

Kevin Schuler

EPIDE

SURGE

Hoa N. Nguyen United States

Jill Tseng United States

Alessandro Lucidi Italy

Macit Arvas Türkiye

Young Lae Cho South Korea

Ian Harley United Kingdom

Peter Grant Australia

Edwin Alvarez United States

Enrico Breda Italy

Vijaya Galic United States

Hoa N. Nguyen United States

Kevin Schuler

369 ×0.5

386 ×0.8

163 ×0.8

EPIDE

212 ×1.1

SURGE

121 ×0.8

Citations per year, relative to Kevin Schuler Kevin Schuler (= 1×) peers Hoa N. Nguyen

Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Schuler

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Schuler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Schuler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Schuler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Schuler

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Schuler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Schuler. The network helps show where Kevin Schuler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Schuler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Schuler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Schuler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Schuler. Kevin Schuler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Pavelka, James, Jack Basil, Kevin Schuler, et al.. (2022). Patient perspectives of telemedicine in gynecologic oncology during COVID. Gynecologic Oncology Reports. 43. 101071–101071. 5 indexed citations

Schuler, Kevin, et al.. (2022). Evaluating the relationship between high-risk antepartum cervical cytology and postpartum colposcopy pathology (419). Gynecologic Oncology. 166. S211–S211. 1 indexed citations

Rossi, Emma, Lynn D. Kowalski, Jennifer Scalici, et al.. (2017). A Comparison of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy to Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging (FIRES Trial): A Multicentre, Prospective, Cohort Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 72(8). 479–480. 24 indexed citations

Rossi, Emma, Lynn D. Kowalski, Jennifer Scalici, et al.. (2017). A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. The Lancet Oncology. 18(3). 384–392. 599 indexed citations breakdown →

Crisp, Catrina C., et al.. (2017). Outcomes Associated With Transfusion at Time of Hysterectomy [16D]. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 129(1). 45S–45S. 1 indexed citations

Sheng, Xiugui, Kevin Schuler, Yan Zhong, et al.. (2016). The effect of celecoxib on tumor growth in ovarian cancer cells and a genetically engineered mouse model of serous ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 7(26). 39582–39594. 37 indexed citations

Boggess, John F., Lynn D. Kowalski, Jennifer Scalici, et al.. (2016). Bilateral SLN mapping for cervical cancer with ICG and robotic fluorescence imaging is associated with greater accuracy in detecting metastatic disease. Gynecologic Oncology. 141. 21–21.

Sinkey, Rachel, James Pavelka, Joseph M. Guenther, Kevin Schuler, & Jack Basil. (2015). Combination Risk-Reducing Breast, Gynecologic and Reconstructive Surgery Among High-Risk Women: Does Surgical Order Impact Outcome?. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery. 32(2). 124–128. 1 indexed citations

Schuler, Kevin, et al.. (2014). Biological effects of metformin in a preoperative window clinical trial for endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 133. 5–5. 1 indexed citations

10.

Schuler, Kevin, et al.. (2014). Antiproliferative and metabolic effects of metformin in a preoperative window clinical trial for endometrial cancer. Cancer Medicine. 4(2). 161–173. 108 indexed citations

11.

Connolly, AnnaMarie, et al.. (2014). Immediate Surgical Skills Feedback in the Operating Room Using “SurF” Cards. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 6(4). 774–778. 19 indexed citations

12.

Schuler, Kevin, et al.. (2013). A preoperative window study of metformin for the treatment of endometrial cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 31(15_suppl). 5519–5519. 10 indexed citations

13.

Schuler, Kevin, et al.. (2012). Metformin Potently Inhibits Cell Proliferation, Adhesion and Invasion in Ovarian Cancer Cells. Gynecologic Oncology. 125(2). S189–S190.

14.

Geller, Elizabeth J., Kevin Schuler, & John F. Boggess. (2011). Robotic Surgical Training Program in Gynecology: How to Train Residents and Fellows. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 18(2). 224–229. 30 indexed citations

15.

Mendivil, Alberto A., Kevin Schuler, & Paola A. Gehrig. (2009). Non-Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: A Review of Selected Histological Subtypes. Cancer Control. 16(1). 46–52. 105 indexed citations

16.

Ferguson, Robert E. H., Kevin Schuler, Brian P. Thornton, Henry C. Vásconez, & Brian Rinker. (2007). The Effect of Saliva and Oral Intake on the Tensile Properties of Sutures. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 58(3). 268–272. 24 indexed citations

17.

Schuler, Kevin, et al.. (1982). Contribution of the Education Phase to Stress-Inoculation Training. Psychological Reports. 51(2). 611–617. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact