Kevin Nakuya
About
In The Last Decade
Kevin Nakuya
6 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 170
- General Health Professions 90
- Gender Studies 21
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 21
- Nutrition and Dietetics 20
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Nakuya
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Nakuya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Nakuya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Nakuya more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Nakuya
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Nakuya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Nakuya. The network helps show where Kevin Nakuya may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Nakuya
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Nakuya. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Nakuya based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Nakuya. Kevin Nakuya is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 136 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.