Kerri E. Buch
Impact in
- Transplantation top 10%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Hepatology top 10%
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management 2
- Co-authors
- Celia M. Divino (10 shared papers)Scott Q. Nguyen (5 shared papers)Rafik El‐Sabrout (3 shared papers)Edward Chin (3 shared papers)Dana A. Telem (2 shared papers)Kaare J. Weber (4 shared papers)Thomas D. Schiano (1 shared paper)Robert N. Goldstone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Surgeon (2 papers)Hernia (2 papers)Journal of the American College of Surgeons (2 papers)Journal of surgical education (1 paper)Journal of Surgical Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kerri E. Buch
14 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Transplantation 41
- Hepatology 78
- Emergency Medicine 59
- Surgery 246
- Epidemiology 104
Countries citing papers authored by Kerri E. Buch
This map shows the geographic impact of Kerri E. Buch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kerri E. Buch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kerri E. Buch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kerri E. Buch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kerri E. Buch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kerri E. Buch. The network helps show where Kerri E. Buch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Kerri E. Buch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 86 | |
| 2 | Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks. | 2008 | 65 |
| 3 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 14 | Inflammatory bowel disease. A clinical review of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. | 2007 | 1 |
About Kerri E. Buch
Kerri E. Buch is a scholar working on Transplantation, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacy and Parasitology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hernia repair and management (6 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (4 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (2 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (1 paper) and Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (41 citations), Hepatology (78 citations), Emergency Medicine (59 citations), Surgery (246 citations) and Epidemiology (104 citations). Kerri E. Buch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Celia M. Divino, Scott Q. Nguyen, Rafik El‐Sabrout, Edward Chin, Dana A. Telem, Kaare J. Weber, Thomas D. Schiano, Robert N. Goldstone, Mark Reiner and James A. Strauchen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Surgeon, Hernia, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Journal of surgical education and Journal of Surgical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.