Kenneth Mah
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Yitzchak M. BinikGerald M. DevinsGary RodinCamilla ZimmermannAndrea BezjakD. Andrew LoblawAndrew GotowiecSara Kiesler
- Topics
- Cancer survivorship and care (24 papers)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (24 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (16 papers)
- Journals
- CancerClinical Psychology ReviewInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kenneth Mah
57 papers receiving 945 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 304
- Oncology 283
- Psychiatry and Mental health 281
- Sociology and Political Science 260
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 257
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Mah
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Mah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Mah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Mah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Mah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Mah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Mah. The network helps show where Kenneth Mah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth Mah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth Mah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth Mah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth Mah. Kenneth Mah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Kenneth Mah
Kenneth Mah is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Oncology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 59 papers that have together received 978 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (24 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (24 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (281 citations), Clinical Psychology (304 citations) and Oncology (283 citations). Kenneth Mah has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yitzchak M. Binik, Gerald M. Devins, Gary Rodin, Camilla Zimmermann, Andrea Bezjak, D. Andrew Loblaw, Andrew Gotowiec, Sara Kiesler, Sarah Hales and Janet de Groot. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Clinical Psychology Review and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.