Kenneth Kyle

985 citations
6 papers · 829 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Oncology top 5%
    • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Papers in

Kenneth Kyle

6 papers receiving 706 citations

Kenneth Kyle's Hit Papers

Cancer Of The Colon 1967 · 753 citations
7530+19+39Years since publication250500750

Peers

Kenneth Kyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Oncology 415
  • Transplantation 14
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
  • Biochemistry 13
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 19
Replace Toshiki Kamano with:
Toshiki Kamano Japan
Neville C. Davis Australia
K Erhardt Sweden
Toshimasa Kihana Japan
Hsiu‐Po Wang Taiwan
HartmutH. Kirchner Germany
MATSURO FUKUSHIMA Japan
Saâdia Bouraoui Tunisia
Chien Yuh Yeh Taiwan
Yoshinari Imajo Japan
Kenneth Kyle relative to Toshiki Kamano Japan Toshiki Kamano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Toshiki Kamano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth Kyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth Kyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth Kyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth Kyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth Kyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth Kyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth Kyle. The network helps show where Kenneth Kyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth Kyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth Kyle Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth Kyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Kenneth Kyle

Kenneth Kyle is a scholar working on Transplantation, Gastroenterology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions and Oncology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (1 paper), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper) and Ureteral procedures and complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (415 citations), Transplantation (14 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations), Biochemistry (13 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (19 citations). Kenneth Kyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Watson Fr, John S. Spratt, Ralph A. Straffon, David N. H. Hamilton, D. Michael Titterington, J. D. Briggs, Stanley O. Hoerr, Heather M. Dick, Robert S. Flowers and R. FLETCHER DEANE. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgery, The Journal of Urology, Annals of Surgery, European Urology and Transplantation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact