Kenneth G. Geles
- Aging top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 5
- CAR-T cell therapy research 2
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 2
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 3
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- RNA Research and Splicing 3
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 2
- Nuclear Structure and Function 2
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 2
- Co-authors
- Marc DamelinBin‐Bing S. ZhouPeter B. DirksHaiying ZhangJustin C. GrindleyRobert TjianStephen A. AdamRichard N. Freiman
- Cited by
- AgingOncologyCancer Research
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Genes & Development (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Kenneth G. Geles
17 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Aging 45
- Oncology 526
- Cancer Research 264
- Reproductive Medicine 119
- Molecular Biology 885
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth G. Geles
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth G. Geles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth G. Geles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth G. Geles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth G. Geles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth G. Geles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth G. Geles. The network helps show where Kenneth G. Geles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth G. Geles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 11 | Tumour-initiating cells: challenges and opportunities for anticancer drug discoverybreakdown → | 2009 | 687 |
| 12 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 123 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 184 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 78 |
About Kenneth G. Geles
Kenneth G. Geles is a scholar working on Aging, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (2 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (45 citations), Oncology (526 citations) and Cancer Research (264 citations). Kenneth G. Geles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Marc Damelin, Bin‐Bing S. Zhou, Peter B. Dirks, Haiying Zhang, Justin C. Grindley, Robert Tjian, Stephen A. Adam, Richard N. Freiman, Ronald A. DePinho and Ping Hu. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Genes & Development and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.