Kenneth B. Schwartz
- Accounting top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Ceramics and Composites top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Krishnagopal MenonBilly S. SooYigal D. BlumRichard M. LaineHamid MehranD. J. RowcliffeJinlong ChengBernhard Wunderlich
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers)Risk Management in Financial Firms (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesLebanon
In The Last Decade
Kenneth B. Schwartz
21 papers receiving 966 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Accounting 746
- Strategy and Management 232
- Finance 204
- Ceramics and Composites 126
- Materials Chemistry 122
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth B. Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth B. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth B. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth B. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth B. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth B. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth B. Schwartz. The network helps show where Kenneth B. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth B. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth B. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth B. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth B. Schwartz. Kenneth B. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ‘Tally-Ho!’: UPP and the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Association Between Auditor Changes and Reporting Lags | 16 |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | 186 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 214 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 114 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 155 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Kenneth B. Schwartz
Kenneth B. Schwartz is a scholar working on Accounting, Ceramics and Composites and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (746 citations), Ceramics and Composites (126 citations) and Finance (204 citations). Kenneth B. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Krishnagopal Menon, Billy S. Soo, Yigal D. Blum, Richard M. Laine, Hamid Mehran, D. J. Rowcliffe, Jinlong Cheng, Bernhard Wunderlich, R. B. Von Dreele and Mark S. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Financial Economics and Journal of Materials Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.