Kenneth A. Weber
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Co-authors
- Todd B. ParrishJames M. ElliottSean MackeyAndrew C. SmithSangeetha MadhavanJames W. StinearXue WangMark T. Stewart
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (27 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (25 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (21 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Kenneth A. Weber
98 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 478
- Surgery 420
- Pharmacology 243
- Biomedical Engineering 224
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 219
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth A. Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth A. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth A. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth A. Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth A. Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth A. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth A. Weber. The network helps show where Kenneth A. Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth A. Weber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth A. Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth A. Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth A. Weber. Kenneth A. Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Differences in Structural Brain Characteristics Between Individuals with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain and Asymptomatic Controls: A Case–Control Study | 7 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Kenneth A. Weber
Kenneth A. Weber is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Rehabilitation, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (27 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (25 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (478 citations), Rehabilitation (149 citations) and Neurology (163 citations). Kenneth A. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Todd B. Parrish, James M. Elliott, Sean Mackey, Andrew C. Smith, Sangeetha Madhavan, James W. Stinear, Xue Wang, Mark T. Stewart, Zachary A. Smith and Yufen Chen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.