Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik. Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik
17 papers receiving 752 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik. The network helps show where Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenn Ka‐Heng Chik more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.