Kendra C. Buresch

1.2k total citations
25 papers, 792 citations indexed

About

Kendra C. Buresch is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Kendra C. Buresch has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 792 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 18 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 12 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Kendra C. Buresch's work include Cephalopods and Marine Biology (24 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (12 papers). Kendra C. Buresch is often cited by papers focused on Cephalopods and Marine Biology (24 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (12 papers). Kendra C. Buresch collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Portugal. Kendra C. Buresch's co-authors include Roger T. Hanlon, Chuan‐Chin Chiao, Lydia M. Mäthger, Charles Chubb, Alexandra Barbosa, Ana Barbosa, Jennifer Kelly, Justine J. Allen, Jean Geary Boal and Gregg T. Nagle and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Scientific Reports and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Kendra C. Buresch

23 papers receiving 783 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kendra C. Buresch United States 15 648 351 156 151 129 25 792
Alexandra Barbosa United States 16 794 1.2× 406 1.2× 125 0.8× 187 1.2× 126 1.0× 19 985
Justine J. Allen United States 14 397 0.6× 226 0.6× 87 0.6× 97 0.6× 61 0.5× 17 612
Jennifer Basil United States 14 497 0.8× 317 0.9× 222 1.4× 45 0.3× 164 1.3× 22 836
Jean Geary Boal United States 22 860 1.3× 462 1.3× 172 1.1× 69 0.5× 339 2.6× 32 1.1k
Anne‐Sophie Darmaillacq France 19 637 1.0× 288 0.8× 143 0.9× 33 0.2× 244 1.9× 40 902
Giovanna Ponte Italy 14 682 1.1× 307 0.9× 93 0.6× 31 0.2× 170 1.3× 32 845
Martin J. How United Kingdom 22 634 1.0× 503 1.4× 320 2.1× 48 0.3× 79 0.6× 56 1.4k
Frank W. Grasso United States 14 447 0.7× 311 0.9× 161 1.0× 52 0.3× 88 0.7× 17 1.2k
Bernd U. Budelmann United States 12 418 0.6× 291 0.8× 125 0.8× 48 0.3× 95 0.7× 18 547
Andrew Packard Italy 16 1.0k 1.6× 565 1.6× 363 2.3× 125 0.8× 183 1.4× 25 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Kendra C. Buresch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kendra C. Buresch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kendra C. Buresch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kendra C. Buresch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kendra C. Buresch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kendra C. Buresch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kendra C. Buresch. The network helps show where Kendra C. Buresch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kendra C. Buresch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kendra C. Buresch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kendra C. Buresch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kendra C. Buresch. Kendra C. Buresch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2025). Octopus arm flexibility facilitates complex behaviors in diverse natural environments. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 31875–31875.
3.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2024). Evidence for tactile 3D shape discrimination by octopus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 210(5). 815–823. 4 indexed citations
4.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2022). Contact chemoreception in multi-modal sensing of prey by Octopus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 208(3). 435–442. 9 indexed citations
5.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2022). An experimental method for evoking and characterizing dynamic color patterning of cuttlefish during prey capture. Journal of Biological Methods. 9(2). 1–1. 2 indexed citations
6.
Kennedy, Emily B., et al.. (2020). Octopus arms exhibit exceptional flexibility. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 20872–20872. 42 indexed citations
7.
Chubb, Charles, et al.. (2018). Dark scene elements strongly influence cuttlefish camouflage responses in visually cluttered environments. Vision Research. 149. 86–101. 3 indexed citations
8.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2017). Dynamic masquerade with morphing three-dimensional skin in cuttlefish. Biology Letters. 13(3). 24 indexed citations
10.
Staudinger, Michelle D., Kendra C. Buresch, Lydia M. Mäthger, et al.. (2013). Defensive Responses of Cuttlefish to Different Teleost Predators. Biological Bulletin. 225(3). 161–174. 27 indexed citations
11.
Chiao, Chuan‐Chin, et al.. (2013). How visual edge features influence cuttlefish camouflage patterning. Vision Research. 83. 40–47. 9 indexed citations
12.
Buresch, Kendra C., Lydia M. Mäthger, Justine J. Allen, et al.. (2011). The use of background matching vs. masquerade for camouflage in cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Vision Research. 51(23-24). 2362–2368. 33 indexed citations
13.
Cummins, Scott F., Jean Geary Boal, Kendra C. Buresch, et al.. (2011). Extreme Aggression in Male Squid Induced by a β-MSP-like Pheromone. Current Biology. 21(4). 322–327. 47 indexed citations
14.
Chiao, Chuan‐Chin, et al.. (2009). The scaling effects of substrate texture on camouflage patterning in cuttlefish. Vision Research. 49(13). 1647–1656. 68 indexed citations
15.
Chiao, Chuan‐Chin, Charles Chubb, Kendra C. Buresch, et al.. (2009). Mottle camouflage patterns in cuttlefish: quantitative characterization and visual background stimuli that evoke them. Journal of Experimental Biology. 213(2). 187–199. 32 indexed citations
16.
Allen, Justine J., Lydia M. Mäthger, Alexandra Barbosa, et al.. (2009). Cuttlefish dynamic camouflage: responses to substrate choice and integration of multiple visual cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 277(1684). 1031–1039. 38 indexed citations
17.
Barbosa, Alexandra, Lydia M. Mäthger, Kendra C. Buresch, et al.. (2008). Cuttlefish camouflage: The effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking uniform, mottle or disruptive body patterns. Vision Research. 48(10). 1242–1253. 133 indexed citations
18.
Hanlon, Roger T., Chuan‐Chin Chiao, Lydia M. Mäthger, et al.. (2008). Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 364(1516). 429–437. 179 indexed citations
19.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2004). Experimental Evidence That Ovary and Oviducal Gland Extracts Influence Male Agonistic Behavior in Squids. Biological Bulletin. 206(1). 1–3. 19 indexed citations
20.
Buresch, Kendra C., et al.. (2003). Contact Chemosensory Cues in Egg Bundles Elicit Male–Male Agonistic Conflicts in the Squid Loligo pealeii. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 29(3). 547–560. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026