Kendall E. Bailes
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- History top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- Soviet and Russian History (5 papers)Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (4 papers)Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers)
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceGeneral PsychologyPolitical Science and International Relations
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryTechnology and Culture
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kendall E. Bailes
18 papers receiving 150 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Political Science and International Relations 98
- Sociology and Political Science 90
- History and Philosophy of Science 24
- History 21
- Economics and Econometrics 20
Countries citing papers authored by Kendall E. Bailes
This map shows the geographic impact of Kendall E. Bailes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kendall E. Bailes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kendall E. Bailes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kendall E. Bailes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kendall E. Bailes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kendall E. Bailes. The network helps show where Kendall E. Bailes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kendall E. Bailes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kendall E. Bailes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kendall E. Bailes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kendall E. Bailes. Kendall E. Bailes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | Technology and Society under Lenin and Stalin | 7 |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Kendall E. Bailes
Kendall E. Bailes is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 23 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soviet and Russian History (5 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (4 papers) and Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations), General Psychology (6 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (98 citations). Kendall E. Bailes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sheila Fitzpatrick, Morgan Sherwood, Alexander Vucinich, Richard B. Day and Loren R. Graham. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Technology and Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.