Kelly Tiercelet
About
In The Last Decade
Kelly Tiercelet
3 papers receiving 36 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 27
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 25
- Clinical Psychology 16
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 9
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 6
Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Tiercelet
This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Tiercelet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Tiercelet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Tiercelet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly Tiercelet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Tiercelet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Tiercelet. The network helps show where Kelly Tiercelet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelly Tiercelet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelly Tiercelet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelly Tiercelet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kelly Tiercelet. Kelly Tiercelet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.