Keith Tucker

816 total citations
26 papers, 587 citations indexed

About

Keith Tucker is a scholar working on Surgery, Economics and Econometrics and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Tucker has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 587 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Recurrent topics in Keith Tucker's work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (18 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (13 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (9 papers). Keith Tucker is often cited by papers focused on Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (18 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (13 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (9 papers). Keith Tucker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Denmark. Keith Tucker's co-authors include P. J. Gregg, Simon Donell, Martyn Porter, Matthew L. Costa, Art Sedrakyan, Alastair G. Rothwell, Ashley Blom, Stephen E. Graves, Joshua J. Jacobs and Paul Baker and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Keith Tucker

24 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith Tucker United Kingdom 13 502 72 33 28 27 26 587
Melbin Thomas United States 11 734 1.5× 18 0.3× 29 0.9× 12 0.4× 13 0.5× 22 794
Rory Ferguson United Kingdom 8 426 0.8× 28 0.4× 18 0.5× 7 0.3× 13 0.5× 10 535
Franziska Beyer Germany 14 721 1.4× 19 0.3× 15 0.5× 24 0.9× 10 0.4× 42 800
Anne Postler Germany 14 592 1.2× 34 0.5× 16 0.5× 24 0.9× 8 0.3× 42 780
L. Ingerson Australia 2 833 1.7× 34 0.5× 23 0.7× 4 0.1× 12 0.4× 4 901
Timo Puolakka Finland 18 1.6k 3.2× 45 0.6× 55 1.7× 6 0.2× 22 0.8× 31 1.7k
Ajit J. Deshmukh United States 19 1.0k 2.0× 39 0.5× 12 0.4× 29 1.0× 5 0.2× 49 1.1k
Alexander L. Neuwirth United States 14 482 1.0× 27 0.4× 6 0.2× 23 0.8× 20 0.7× 47 544
J.P. Hodgkinson United Kingdom 14 717 1.4× 31 0.4× 17 0.5× 32 1.1× 33 1.2× 30 780
S D Stulberg United States 9 605 1.2× 39 0.5× 7 0.2× 9 0.3× 8 0.3× 21 677

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Tucker. The network helps show where Keith Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Tucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Tucker. Keith Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Springer, Bryan D., et al.. (2024). Is American Joint Replacement Registry Data Consistent With International Survivorship in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 39(9). S46–S50. 3 indexed citations
3.
Lübbeke, Anne, Christophe Combescure, Christophe Baréa, et al.. (2023). Clinical investigations to evaluate high-risk orthopaedic devices: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed medical literature. EFORT Open Reviews. 8(11). 781–791. 5 indexed citations
4.
Günther, K.‐P., Keith Tucker, Per Kjærsgaard‐Andersen, et al.. (2022). Partieller oder vollständiger Wechsel in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik?. Die Orthopädie. 51(8). 638–645.
5.
Tucker, Keith, Klaus‐Peter Günther, Per Kjærsgaard‐Andersen, et al.. (2021). EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Reviews. 6(11). 982–1005. 11 indexed citations
6.
Phillips, Jonathan & Keith Tucker. (2021). Implant brand portfolios, the potential for camouflage of data, and the role of the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel in total knee arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 103-B(10). 1555–1560. 8 indexed citations
7.
Tucker, Keith. (2020). How registry data can improve outcomes from joint replacement – a seminal paper. Acta Orthopaedica. 91(3). 230–231. 4 indexed citations
8.
Tucker, Keith, et al.. (2015). Mixing of components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty: prevalence and comparative outcomes.. PubMed. 86(6). 671–7. 28 indexed citations
9.
Haddad, Behrooz, et al.. (2015). A Novel Minimally Invasive Technique for Treatment of Unicameral Bone Cysts. The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 9(1). 475–479. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hart, Alister, Paul D. Quinn, Ferdinand Lali, et al.. (2012). Cobalt from metal-on-metal hip replacements may be the clinically relevant active agent responsible for periprosthetic tissue reactions. Acta Biomaterialia. 8(10). 3865–3873. 50 indexed citations
11.
Baker, Paul, Simon Jameson, David J. Deehan, et al.. (2012). Mid-term equivalent survival of medial and lateral unicondylar knee replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 94-B(12). 1641–1648. 70 indexed citations
12.
Graves, Stephen E., Alastair G. Rothwell, Keith Tucker, Joshua J. Jacobs, & Art Sedrakyan. (2011). A Multinational Assessment of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Hip Replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 93(Supplement_3). 43–47. 65 indexed citations
13.
Tucker, Keith, P. J. Gregg, Peter Kay, et al.. (2011). Monitoring the Introduction and Performance of a Joint Replacement: The United Kingdom Metal-on-Metal Alert. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 93(Supplement_3). 37–42. 13 indexed citations
14.
Davies, Charlotte, Paula Lorgelly, Ian Shemilt, et al.. (2010). Can choices between alternative hip prostheses be evidence based? a review of the economic evaluation literature. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 8(1). 20–20. 12 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Henry Wynn, et al.. (2010). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABDUCTION CONTRACTURE AND LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. 389–389. 1 indexed citations
16.
Sibanda, Nokuthaba, Lynn P. Copley, Jim Lewsey, et al.. (2008). Revision Rates after Primary Hip and Knee Replacement in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS Medicine. 5(9). e179–e179. 59 indexed citations
17.
Mascio, Livio Di, Richard Carey‐Smith, & Keith Tucker. (2008). Open reduction of developmental hip dysplasia using a medial approach: a review of 24 hips.. PubMed. 74(3). 343–8. 12 indexed citations
18.
Darrah, Clare, et al.. (2008). Community-Based Orthopaedic Follow-Up. Is it What Doctors and Patients Want?. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 91(1). 66–70. 11 indexed citations
19.
Costa, Matthew L., Simon Donell, & Keith Tucker. (2006). The Long-Term Outcome of Tendon Lengthening for Chronic Achilles Tendon Pain. Foot & Ankle International. 27(9). 672–676. 22 indexed citations
20.
Tucker, Keith. (1978). Some aspects of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Injury. 9(3). 216–220. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026