Keith M. Campbell

508 total citations
9 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Keith M. Campbell is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith M. Campbell has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 7 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Keith M. Campbell's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers). Keith M. Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers). Keith M. Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Keith M. Campbell's co-authors include Michael J. McGrath, Frank H. Burton, Sheldon B. Sparber, Marc G. Caron, Luı́s de Lecea, Matthew B. Veldman and Li-Yan Sun and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Brain Research and European Journal of Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Keith M. Campbell

9 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Keith M. Campbell

CP

CMN

CN

MB

SP

Matthew Kruse United States

Elizabeth E. Manning Australia

Laura J. Mosher United States

Zachary T. Nolan United States

M. Henin Italy

Tetsuya Marui Japan

A. S. A. Al-Ruwaitea United Kingdom

Y.C. Janardhan Reddy India

Stephanie L. Quail Australia

Lauren W. Cochran United States

Matthew Kruse United States

Keith M. Campbell

190 ×0.7

CP

146 ×0.7

CMN

154 ×0.8

CN

46 ×1.0

MB

21 ×0.6

SP

Citations per year, relative to Keith M. Campbell Keith M. Campbell (= 1×) peers Matthew Kruse

Countries citing papers authored by Keith M. Campbell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith M. Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith M. Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith M. Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith M. Campbell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith M. Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith M. Campbell. The network helps show where Keith M. Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith M. Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith M. Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith M. Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith M. Campbell. Keith M. Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

McGrath, Michael J., et al.. (2000). Glutamatergic drugs exacerbate symptomatic behavior in a transgenic model of comorbid Tourette’s syndrome and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Brain Research. 877(1). 23–30. 74 indexed citations

2.

Campbell, Keith M., Matthew B. Veldman, Michael J. McGrath, & Frank H. Burton. (2000). TS+OCD-like neuropotentiated mice are supersensitive to seizure induction. Neuroreport. 11(10). 2335–2338. 21 indexed citations

3.

Campbell, Keith M., Michael J. McGrath, & Frank H. Burton. (1999). Differential response of cortical–limbic neuropotentiated compulsive mice to dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists. European Journal of Pharmacology. 371(2-3). 103–111. 20 indexed citations

4.

McGrath, Michael J., Keith M. Campbell, & Frank H. Burton. (1999). The role of cognitive and affective processing in a transgenic mouse model of cortical-limbic neuropotentiated compulsive behavior.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 113(6). 1249–1256. 20 indexed citations

5.

Campbell, Keith M., Michael J. McGrath, & Frank H. Burton. (1999). Behavioral effects of cocaine on a transgenic mouse model of cortical–limbic compulsion. Brain Research. 833(2). 216–224. 26 indexed citations

6.

McGrath, Michael J., Keith M. Campbell, Matthew B. Veldman, & Frank H. Burton. (1999). Anxiety in a transgenic mouse model of cortical-limbic neuropotentiated compulsive behavior. Behavioural Pharmacology. 10(5). 435–443. 40 indexed citations

7.

McGrath, Michael J., Keith M. Campbell, & Frank H. Burton. (1999). The role of cognitive and affective processing in a transgenic mouse model of cortical-limbic neuropotentiated compulsive behavior.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 113(6). 1249–1256. 19 indexed citations

8.

Campbell, Keith M., Luı́s de Lecea, Marc G. Caron, et al.. (1999). OCD-Like Behaviors Caused by a Neuropotentiating Transgene Targeted to Cortical and Limbic D1+ Neurons. Journal of Neuroscience. 19(12). 5044–5053. 117 indexed citations

9.

Campbell, Keith M., et al.. (1998). Detecting Subtle Differences in Behavior Using Waveform Display Analysis. Physiology & Behavior. 64(1). 83–91. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact