Keith L. Dear

567 total citations
18 papers, 273 citations indexed

About

Keith L. Dear is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith L. Dear has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 273 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Gastroenterology and 5 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Keith L. Dear's work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). Keith L. Dear is often cited by papers focused on Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). Keith L. Dear collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Keith L. Dear's co-authors include John O. Hunter, Marinos Elia, Juliet Compston, David S. Sanders, Matthew Kurien, Mark McAlindon, Barbara Hoeroldt, Kapil Kapur, John Leeds and Sandip Sen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gut and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Keith L. Dear

17 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith L. Dear United Kingdom 8 130 120 87 73 45 18 273
Jarosław Kwiecień Poland 12 163 1.3× 163 1.4× 75 0.9× 65 0.9× 56 1.2× 42 388
Oleg Jadrešin Croatia 10 134 1.0× 212 1.8× 54 0.6× 83 1.1× 22 0.5× 23 316
V. Tolia United States 8 162 1.2× 157 1.3× 61 0.7× 34 0.5× 42 0.9× 19 309
Hazel Duncan United Kingdom 8 127 1.0× 116 1.0× 137 1.6× 125 1.7× 21 0.5× 11 292
Luis Soifer Argentina 8 203 1.6× 238 2.0× 25 0.3× 51 0.7× 37 0.8× 33 303
Katharina Werkstetter Germany 14 179 1.4× 152 1.3× 264 3.0× 300 4.1× 50 1.1× 21 491
A.M. Riordan United Kingdom 6 128 1.0× 99 0.8× 192 2.2× 132 1.8× 45 1.0× 6 334
Teresa Capriati Italy 14 195 1.5× 172 1.4× 82 0.9× 105 1.4× 61 1.4× 41 482
Krystyna Wąsowska‐Królikowska Poland 11 79 0.6× 56 0.5× 20 0.2× 43 0.6× 87 1.9× 45 288
Lihua Peng China 12 179 1.4× 147 1.2× 27 0.3× 32 0.4× 33 0.7× 21 415

Countries citing papers authored by Keith L. Dear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith L. Dear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith L. Dear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith L. Dear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith L. Dear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith L. Dear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith L. Dear. The network helps show where Keith L. Dear may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith L. Dear

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith L. Dear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith L. Dear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith L. Dear. Keith L. Dear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Corfe, Bernard M., Keith L. Dear, Andy Cole, et al.. (2024). Can an educational video improve the adequacy of bowel preparation for patients undergoing their first colonoscopy? Results of the EBOPS RCT. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(3). E402–E412.
2.
Dear, Keith L., Stephen Foley, Andy Cole, et al.. (2021). P8 Does an educational video improve bowel preparation in patients first colonoscopy? A UK multi-centre RCT. A45.1–A45. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kurien, Matthew, Rachel Tattersall, Mark McAlindon, et al.. (2016). Gastrostomies Preserve But Do Not Increase Quality of Life for Patients and Caregivers. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 15(7). 1047–1054. 21 indexed citations
4.
Penny, Hugo A., Matthew Kurien, Michelle Lau, et al.. (2015). Changing trends in the UK management of upper GI bleeding: is there evidence of reduced UK training experience?. Frontline Gastroenterology. 7(1). 67–72. 16 indexed citations
5.
Mooney, Peter D., John Leeds, Kate Evans, et al.. (2013). Case-finding for coeliac disease in secondary care: A prospective multicentre UK study. Digestive and Liver Disease. 46(1). 32–35. 12 indexed citations
6.
Kurien, Matthew, Faekah Gohar, Keith L. Dear, et al.. (2013). PTU-041 Dedicated GI Bleed Services Result in a Significant Difference in Inpatient Mortality: a South Yorkshire Experience. Gut. 62(Suppl 1). A59.3–A60. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kurien, Matthew, Said Din, Keith L. Dear, & David Elphick. (2012). Same day bidirectional endoscopy - does the procedural order matter?. PubMed. 21(3). 328–328. 3 indexed citations
8.
Bhattacharyya, Rupam, Ased Ali, Debabrata Majumdar, et al.. (2011). A prospective pilot study of the prevalence of pancreatic disease in patients with alcohol related liver disease using faecal elastase-1. Gut. 60(Suppl 1). A238.2–A238. 2 indexed citations
9.
Kurien, Matthew, et al.. (2011). Same day bidirectional endoscopy- does the order of the procedures matter?. Gut. 60(Suppl 1). A192.1–A192. 3 indexed citations
10.
Leeds, John, Mark McAlindon, Julia Grant, et al.. (2011). Albumin level and patient age predict outcomes in patients referred for gastrostomy insertion: internal and external validation of a gastrostomy score and comparison with artificial neural networks. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 74(5). 1033–1039.e3. 18 indexed citations
11.
Kurien, Matthew, Holly Robson, M E McAlindon, et al.. (2011). External validation of a prognostic scoring system for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): Table 1. Gut. 60(Suppl 1). A17.1–A17. 1 indexed citations
12.
Kurien, Matthew, Holly Robson, John Leeds, et al.. (2011). External validation of a prognostic scoring system for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Proceedings of The Nutrition Society. 70(OCE5). 1 indexed citations
13.
Fearon, A., et al.. (2010). HP31: MINIMUM ONE YEAR OUTCOMES AND SATISFACTION FOLLOWING GLUTEAL TENDON RECONSTRUCTION. 188–188. 1 indexed citations
14.
Dear, Keith L., Marinos Elia, & John O. Hunter. (2005). Do Interventions Which Reduce Colonic Bacterial Fermentation Improve Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome?. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 50(4). 758–766. 77 indexed citations
15.
Sen, Sandip, et al.. (2002). Evaluation of hydrogen excretion after lactulose administration as a screening test for causes of irritable bowel syndrome. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 14(7). 753–756. 16 indexed citations
16.
Dear, Keith L. & John O. Hunter. (2001). Colonoscopic Hydrostatic Balloon Dilatation of Crohn's Strictures. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 33(4). 315–318. 66 indexed citations
17.
Dear, Keith L., Juliet Compston, & John O. Hunter. (2001). Treatments for Crohn's disease that minimise steroid doses are associated with a reduced risk of osteoporosis. Clinical Nutrition. 20(6). 541–546. 31 indexed citations
18.
Dear, Keith L.. (2001). Food intolerance and allergy in gastrointestinal disorders. Hospital Medicine. 62(12). 731–734. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jarosław Kwiecień Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Oleg Jadrešin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by V. Tolia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hazel Duncan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luis Soifer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katharina Werkstetter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A.M. Riordan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Teresa Capriati Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Krystyna Wąsowska‐Królikowska Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lihua Peng
Rankless by CCL
2026