Keith L. Dear

572 citations
18 papers · 274 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Diverticular Disease and Complications 2
    • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 2
    • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment 2

Keith L. Dear

17 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Keith L. Dear
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Gastroenterology 106
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 33
  • Genetics 57
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 4
  • Speech and Hearing 12
Replace Reiko Miyazawa with:
Reiko Miyazawa Japan
Attila Nagy Hungary
Jaya Punati United States
V. Tolia United States
Daria Maniero Italy
A.M. Riordan United Kingdom
D. Lescut France
Sun‐Chuan Dai United States
Ilse Julia Broekaert Germany
Etna Masip Spain
Keith L. Dear relative to Reiko Miyazawa Japan Reiko Miyazawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Reiko Miyazawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith L. Dear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith L. Dear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith L. Dear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith L. Dear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith L. Dear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith L. Dear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith L. Dear. The network helps show where Keith L. Dear may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith L. Dear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith L. Dear Line = papers co-authored together Keith L. Dear links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200577
2 200166
3 200132
4 201621
5 201118
6 201516
7 200216
8 201312
9 20013
10 20113
11
Same day bidirectional endoscopy - does the procedural order matter?
20123
12 20112
13 20131
14 20111
15
HP31: MINIMUM ONE YEAR OUTCOMES AND SATISFACTION FOLLOWING GLUTEAL TENDON RECONSTRUCTION
20101
16 20211
17 20111
18 20240

About Keith L. Dear

Keith L. Dear is a scholar working on Surgery, Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper) and Health Services Management and Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (106 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (33 citations), Genetics (57 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (4 citations) and Speech and Hearing (12 citations). Keith L. Dear has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John O. Hunter, Marinos Elia, Juliet Compston, David S. Sanders, Matthew Kurien, Barbara Hoeroldt, Mark McAlindon, John Leeds, Kapil Kapur and Sandip Sen. Their work appears in journals such as Gut, Digestive and Liver Disease, Clinical Nutrition, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Proceedings of The Nutrition Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact