Keith Archer

443 citations
28 papers · 269 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Archer

26 papers receiving 219 citations

Peers

Keith Archer
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Public Administration 33
  • Political Science and International Relations 178
  • Communication 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 105
  • Gender Studies 22
Replace David H. Tabb with:
David H. Tabb United States
Dean Jaensch Australia
Per Torsvik Norway
Howard L. Reiter United States
Bridget Taylor United Kingdom
David M. Rabban United States
Frank L. Wilson United States
Jens Henrik Haahr Denmark
Larry B. Hill United States
Anders Widfeldt United Kingdom
Keith Archer relative to David H. Tabb United States David H. Tabb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
David H. Tabb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Archer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Archer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Archer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Archer. The network helps show where Keith Archer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Keith Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Archer Line = papers co-authored together Keith Archer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200553
2 199633
3
Regionalism and party politics in Canada
200225
4 198522
5 198218
6 198718
7 198818
8 200415
9 199413
10
Parameters of power : Canada's political institutions
199510
11 19906
12 19906
13 19936
14 19825
15 19994
16 20042
17 19862
18 19882
19
Canadian trade unions and the New Democratic Party
19932
20 19912

About Keith Archer

Keith Archer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Law and Public Administration, having authored 28 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Canadian Identity and History (6 papers), Political Systems and Governance (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Political Science Research and Education (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (33 citations), Political Science and International Relations (178 citations), Communication (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (105 citations) and Gender Studies (22 citations). Keith Archer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Axelrod, John C. Courtney, Lisa Young, Lucien J. B. LaCoste, Mark Pickup, Allan Kornberg, Thomas Flanagan, Desmond Morton, Roger Gibbins and Margaret Clarke. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Political Science, Canadian Public Policy, Labour / Le Travail, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy and Journal of Canadian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact