Kehong Ding

20 papers receiving 876 citations

Peers

Kehong Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Biological Psychiatry 59
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 155
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 232
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 67
  • Physiology 211
Replace Katherine J. Motyl with:
Katherine J. Motyl United States
Frank Drießler Australia
Helen Farman Sweden
Antonia Sophocleous United Kingdom
Tai‐Chan Peng United States
Yun Shi China
Alex Shimura Yamashita Brazil
Kechun Tang United States
Hisashi Koide Japan
Sabine Vettorazzi Germany
Kehong Ding relative to Katherine J. Motyl United States Katherine J. Motyl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Katherine J. Motyl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kehong Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kehong Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kehong Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kehong Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kehong Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kehong Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kehong Ding. The network helps show where Kehong Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kehong Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kehong Ding Line = papers co-authored together Kehong Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2006168
2 2007119
3 2008113
4 202177
5 201567
6 200652
7 201843
8 201536
9 200032
10 199730
11 201729
12 201428
13 201426
14 202221
15 201919
16 202013
17 202010
18 20231
19 20191
20 20201

About Kehong Ding

Kehong Ding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 886 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Metabolism and Diseases (4 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (4 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (3 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (3 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (3 papers), Bone health and treatments (3 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (3 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (59 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (155 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (232 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (67 citations) and Physiology (211 citations). Kehong Ding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Carlos M. Isales, Mark W. Hamrick, Qing Zhong, Wendy B. Bollag, Roni J. Bollag, Ding Xie, Karl Insogna, Serge Ferrari, Xingming Shi and Baolin Kang. Their work appears in journals such as The FASEB Journal, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, Bone, The Journals of Gerontology Series A and Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact